Drugs
On this page you can find programs and practices related to Drugs. Select "Search Filters" to narrow down the list by rating, extent of evidence, and many other aspects of the programs or practices. Skip to Practices
CrimeSolutions’ ratings are assigned from standardized reviews of rigorous evaluations and meta-analyses. While we encourage you to learn more about this process, you don’t need to in order to benefit from it. Our clear ratings and profiles can help you determine if a program or category of program is worth pursuing.
Icon | Rating | Description |
---|---|---|
![]() |
Effective | Implementing the program, or a program encompassed by the practice, will achieve the intended outcome. |
![]() |
Promising | Implementing the program, or a program encompassed by the practice, will achieve the intended outcome. |
![]() |
Ineffective | Implementing the program, or a program encompassed by the practice, will not achieve the intended outcome. |
![]() |
Negative Effects | Implementing the program, or program encompassed by the practice, will not result in intended outcome(s) and may result in harmful effects. |
Programs
Showing Results For:
Topic: drugsTitle | Evidence Rating | Topics | Summary | RCT | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Profile: Modified Therapeutic Community for Individuals With Mental Illness and Chemical Abuse (MICA) Disorders Who Commit Offenses | One study | Mental health, Corrections, Reentry, Correctional facilities, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Drugs | This program is an adaptation of the therapeutic community models for individuals in prison with co-occurring drug and/or alcohol use problems and mental health disorders to reduce substance use, mental illness, and recidivism. The program is rated Promising for reducing criminal activity, reincarceration, drug and alcohol offenses, illegal drug use, alcohol use, and multiple substance use (either legal or illegal). Date Posted: |
None | |||||
Program Profile: Across Ages | Schools, Substance abuse, Truancy, Youth development, Positive youth development, Drug abuse prevention and education, Drugs, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Juvenile delinquency | This is an intergenerational mentoring initiative designed to delay or reduce substance use by increasing the resiliency and protective factors of at-risk middle school youth. The program is rated Ineffective for improving outcomes related to alcohol use, marijuana use, self-control, problem behaviors, school absences, grades, and bonding. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||||||
Program Profile: Multisystemic Therapy–Family Integrated Transitions (MST-FIT) | Mental health, Substance abuse, Reentry, Youth development, Home visiting, Treatment, Young juvenile offenders, Corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Drugs, Drug treatment | This intervention provides integrated individual and family services to juveniles who have co-occurring mental health and chemical dependency disorders during their transition from incarceration back into the community. The program is rated Promising for reducing felony recidivism. Date Posted: |
|||||||
Program Profile: CHOICE | Schools, Alcohol, Underage drinking, School safety, Afterschool, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Substance abuse, Legal substances, Drugs | This is a voluntary afterschool program for middle school aged youths to inform them about substance use and prevent them from starting or continuing alcohol use. The program is rated Effective for reducing alcohol use frequency, and Ineffective for reducing heavy alcohol use and improving alcohol resistance self-efficacy (the self-confidence to resist alcohol). Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||||||
Program Profile: The Pathways Home Foster Care Reunification Intervention | Family reunification, Foster care/child welfare system, Drugs | This is a preventive intervention intended to reunite children returning home to their parents after their first stay in foster care. The program sought to prevent reunification failures when children were returned home to their biological parents by supporting parents and by making the transition a smooth process for both immediate and continued parenting success. The program is rated Promising for improving encouragement strategies. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||||||
Program Profile: JOBSTART | Dropout/expulsion, Truancy, Jobs and workforce development, Drug abuse prevention and education, Drugs, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Employment initiatives | This is a community- and school-based program designed to increase academic skills and job placement in disadvantaged youth. The program is rated Effective for increasing receipt of education or training and increasing receipt of a GED. The program is rated Ineffective for increasing total earnings and employment, reducing receipt of food stamps, and reducing arrests and drug use. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||||||
Program Profile: Lions Quest Skills for Adolescence (SFA) | One study | Schools, Cocaine, Marijuana, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, School climate, Drug abuse prevention and education, Drugs, Illegal substances, Legal substances | This is a school-based life skills training curriculum aimed at developing middle-school students’ social skills and competencies for resisting and reducing tobacco, alcohol, and other drug use. The program is rated Promising for reducing marijuana use. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | |||||
Program Profile: CHAT (Motivational Interviewing for Adolescents At-Risk for Substance Use) | Marijuana, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Legal substances | This program uses motivational interviewing in primary care settings for adolescents at risk for substance use. The program is rated Effective for reducing the number of negative consequences experienced as a result of alcohol use and the number of negative consequences experienced as a result of marijuana use. The program is rated Ineffective for increasing one’s belief in their ability to resist using a substance, reducing alcohol use and marijuana use, and time around substance using peers. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||||||
Program Profile: Stepped Collaborative Care for Adolescents (Washington State) | Alcohol, Mental health, Substance abuse, Children exposed to violence, Trauma, Treatment, Legal substances, Drugs | This is an inpatient/outpatient integrated care intervention for injured adolescents designed to reduce violence risk behaviors as well as posttraumatic stress disorder and depressive symptoms by providing a variety of services to adolescents following a traumatic physical injury. The program is rated Promising for reducing weapon carrying. Date Posted: |
None | ||||||
Program Profile: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Plus Mindfulness Meditation for Adolescent Alcohol Consumption (Australia) |
|
Schools, Alcohol, Underage drinking, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Substance abuse, Legal substances, Drugs, Promising Evidence Rating | This program uses psycho–social and present-moment awareness techniques to target adolescents’ alcohol-related cognitions and prevent their alcohol use. The program is rated Promising. Adolescents who received the intervention had reduced growth of alcohol consumption, compared with adolescents in the control group. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in both negative and positive alcohol expectancies and drinking refusal self-efficacy. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | |||||
Program Profile: Imprisonment for Individuals Who Committed a Drunk Driving Offense (New South Wales, Australia) |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Alcohol, Prisons, Corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Courts, Traffic laws, Traffic law enforcement, Law enforcement, Substance abuse, Legal substances, Drugs, No Effects Evidence Rating | This involves prison time for individuals who have committed drunk-driving offenses to reduce their risk of recidivism upon their release. The program is rated Ineffective. There was no statistically significant difference between individuals in the treatment group (who received prison time) and the comparison group (who received a suspended imprisonment sentence) on reoffending with a driving-while-under-the-influence-of-alcohol offense within 6 months’, 24 months’, or 5 years’ time. Date Posted: |
None | |||||
Program Profile: Young Adult Family Check-Up (YA-FCU) |
|
Schools, Juvenile health, Mental health, Youth development, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Drugs, Substance abuse, No Effects Evidence Rating | The program focuses on the relationship between young adults and their parents to prevent substance misuse and other high-risk behaviors and enhance protective factors such as improving communication and strengthening familial relationships, encouraging healthy peer and romantic relationships, and promoting self-efficacy. The program is rated Ineffective. It made no statistically significant impact on reducing the risk level for a problematic transition into young adulthood. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | |||||
Program Profile: New Orientation for Reducing Threats to Health from Secretive-problems That Affect Readiness (NORTH STAR) |
|
Alcohol, Prescription drugs, Treatment, Military personnel, Crime prevention, Substance abuse, Drugs, Drug treatment | This is a prevention planning and implementation system designed to improve risk and protective factors, and reduce secretive problems, in military communities. The program is rated Ineffective. There were no statistically significant differences between the bases assigned to NORTH STAR and the comparison bases on measures of physical or emotional interpersonal violence/partner abuse, physical or emotional child abuse, hazardous drinking, suicidality, or prescription drug misuse. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | |||||
Program Profile: North Dakota’s 24/7 Sobriety Program |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Drug testing, Probation, Law enforcement, Sanctions, Traffic laws, Traffic law enforcement, Crime prevention, Legal substances, Substance abuse, Drugs | This program seeks to reduce the rearrests of individuals previously convicted of driving while under the influence (DUI) of alcohol or drugs through intensive testing and monitoring of drug and alcohol consumption. The program is rated Promising. There was a statistically significant decrease in the rates of DUI arrests by roughly 9 percent in counties that implemented the program, compared with counties that did not implement the program. Date Posted: |
None | |||||
Program Profile: Risk Reduction through Family Therapy (RRFT) for Adolescents |
|
Mental health, Substance abuse, Children exposed to violence, Trauma, Treatment, Rape and sexual assault, Violent crime, Crisis response, Juvenile (under 18), Drugs, Drug treatment | The goal of this exposure-based, integrative intervention was to reduce substance use and mental health problems in adolescents who have experienced trauma. The program is rated Promising. The program had a statistically significant impact on depressive and internalizing symptoms, family cohesion, and family conflict. There were mixed results for PTSD symptoms and substance use. There was no statistically significant impact on externalizing symptoms. Date Posted: |
None | |||||
Program Profile: Community-Level Intervention on Alcohol-Related Motor Vehicle Crashes (Calif.) |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Regulatory offenses, Alcohol, Underage drinking, Law enforcement operations, Law enforcement, Traffic law enforcement, Traffic laws, Legal substances, Drugs | This program was designed to reduce excessive drinking among adolescents and young adults ages 12-25 through community-wide enforcement operations and awareness campaigns. The program is rated Promising. There was a statistically significant reduction in alcohol-related motor vehicle crashes among 15- to 30-year-old drivers in treatment group cities, compared with control group cities. Date Posted: |
None | |||||
Program Profile: Daily Automated Telephony With a Brief Cognitive Intervention for Persons on Parole (Sweden) |
|
Parole, Cell Phones, Mental health, Alcohol, Community corrections, Corrections, Reentry, Legal substances, Drugs | This was an automated telephony program designed for those recently paroled in Sweden that provided immediate feedback to participants and sent daily reports to their parole officers. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group participants reported statistically significantly less alcohol use, drug use, and internalizing behaviors at the 1-month follow-up, compared with control group participants. Date Posted: |
None | |||||
Program Profile: Gender-Specific Drug Treatment Court (Midwestern State) |
|
Probation, Drug courts, Problem-solving courts, Recidivism, Crime prevention | This is a drug court program that provides treatment services to women on probation to reduce their risk of reoffending. The program gives preference to women who have higher need and risk profiles, are mothers, and have substance use problems. The program is rated Promising. Women in the treatment group were statistically significantly less likely to have a new conviction, compared with similar women on probation who did not participate in the program, at the 2-year follow-up. Date Posted: |
None | |||||
Program Profile: The Impact of California’s Proposition 47 (The Reduced Penalties for Some Crimes Initiative) on Recidivism |
|
Mental health, Sentencing guidelines, Drug possession, Prisons, Corrections, Correctional facilities, Drugs, Drug abuse prevention and education, Crime prevention | This is a policy reform passed by California voters to downgrade drug and property offenses from felonies to misdemeanors, to focus prison resources on the most-serious violent offenses, reinvest savings toward prevention, and reduce recidivism. The program is rated Promising. In an evaluation of recidivism, the intervention group had statistically significantly fewer rearrests and reconvictions for any crime or revocation, compared with the control group, at the 1-year follow-up. Date Posted: |
None | |||||
Program Profile: Impact of Statewide Ignition Interlock Laws on Alcohol-Involved Crash Fatalities in the United States |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Alcohol, Vehicles, Crime prevention, Traffic accidents, Legal substances, Drugs | This is a drunk driving prevention initiative that seeks to reduce alcohol-involved crash fatalities by requiring the installation of ignition interlock devices on vehicles of all drivers convicted of driving under the influence. The program is rated Promising. Intervention states with a statewide ignition interlock requirement had a 15 percent decrease in alcohol-involved vehicle crash fatalities, compared with control states. This was a statistically significant difference. Date Posted: |
None | |||||
Program Profile: Web-Based Sexual Assault Risk Reduction (SARR) for College Women |
|
Situational crime prevention, Rape and sexual assault, Violent crime, Crime prevention, Victimization, Campus, Campus Crime, Schools, Substance abuse, Legal substances, Drugs | This was a program for college women who engaged in heavy episodic drinking to provide feedback on their risk perception and resistance to reduce sexual assault. The program is rated Ineffective. Program participants did not statistically significantly differ from those in the control group on measures of incapacitated attempted/completed rape frequency, alcohol-related sexual assault incidents/severity, or use of sexual assault protective behavioral strategies at the 3-month follow-up. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | |||||
Program Profile: Swift and Sure Sanctions Probation Program (Michigan) |
|
Parole, Community corrections, Corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Legal substances, Drugs | This is an alternative-to-incarceration program designed to respond swiftly with sanctions to probation violations of those at high-risk of re-offending. The overall goal is to reduce participants’ recidivism rates. The program is rated Promising. Participants had statistically significant reduction in recidivism rates (overall, misdemeanor, felony, property, drug/alcohol, and other) compared with the comparison group, but there was no statistically significant effects on violent recidivism. Date Posted: |
None | |||||
Program Profile: Motivational Interviewing (MI) Training for Parole Officers in Colorado |
|
Training, Parole, Community corrections, Probation, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Drugs, Violent crime | This is a client-centered counseling approach implemented as a job-training intervention for parole officers in Colorado. The intervention seeks to enhance parole officers’ communication skills to promote motivation for change and reduce recidivism among supervised people on probation. The program is rated Promising. People on probation in the intervention group showed a statistically significant reduction in recidivism outcomes, compared with people on probation in the comparison group. Date Posted: |
None | |||||
Program Profile: Community Reporting Engagement Support and Training (CREST) |
|
Parole, Probation, Mental health, Community corrections, Corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Drugs, Substance abuse | This is an enhanced day reporting center designed to reduce the risk of recidivism in people on probation with mental illnesses. It provides services such as substance abuse treatment and crisis intervention. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group individuals had a statistically significantly lower risk of conviction for any offense, compared with control group participants on standard probation. However, there was no statistically significant effect on the risk of conviction for a felo Date Posted: |
None | |||||
Program Profile: Cooperative Learning |
|
Schools, Underage drinking, School safety, Youth development, School climate, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Drugs | This is a group-based learning approach that seeks to enhance peer relations by increasing opportunities for positive social integration between adolescents. The program is rated Promising. Students in intervention schools reported they were less willing to use alcohol, had fewer deviant peer affiliations, lower perceived student stress and emotional problems, and had higher academic engagement, compared with students in control schools. These differences were statistically significant. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | |||||
Program Profile: Reducing Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) Limits for Motor Vehicle Operations (New Jersey) |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Alcohol, Drugs, Legal substances, Substance abuse, Drugs | This program comprises legislation that was passed to reduce alcohol-related crash fatalities by lowering the blood alcohol concentration limit for adult drivers from 0.10 to 0.08. The program is rated Ineffective. There was a statistically significant reduction in passenger fatalities per crash after the implementation of the legislation; however, there were no statistically significant impacts on driver fatalities per crash or total fatalities per crash. Date Posted: |
None | |||||
Program Profile: Mystery Shop Programs to Reduce Underage Alcohol Sales |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Situational crime prevention, Legal substances, Drugs | This intervention seeks to increase staff ID checks for the sale of alcoholic beverages at licensed establishments, to help prevent sales to minors. The program is rated Effective. The results were mixed. One study found there was a statistically significant increase in age verification rates resulting from the intervention, whereas a second study found no statistically significant increases in ID-checking rates. Overall, the results suggest the intervention influenced ID-checking rates. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | |||||
Program Profile: The Substance Use Prevention Promoted by Eating Family Meals Regularly (SUPPER) Project |
|
Substance abuse, Marijuana, Drugs | This program seeks to help parents become facilitators in preventing children’s substance misuse, by encouraging them to have five or more family meals together weekly. The program is rated Promising. Intervention group parents showed a statistically significant increase in talking with children about alcohol, compared with control group parents, but there were no statistically significant differences in number of family meals per week and talking with children about marijuana and other drugs. Date Posted: |
None | |||||
Program Profile: Operation Regional Analytics for the Safety of Our Residents (RASOR) |
|
|
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() | |
![]() |
Promising | One study |
![]() |
Promising | One study |
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() | |
![]() |
Effective | One study |
![]() |
Effective | One study |
![]() |
Effective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() | |
![]() |
Promising | One study |
![]() |
Promising | One study |
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Effective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Effective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() | |
![]() |
Promising | One study |
![]() |
Promising | One study |
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() | |
![]() |
Promising | One study |
![]() |
Promising | One study |
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() | |
![]() |
Promising | One study |
![]() |
Promising | One study |
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Effective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Negative Effects | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Effective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Effective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Effective | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() | |
![]() |
Negative Effects | One study |
![]() |
Negative Effects | One study |
![]() |
Negative Effects | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Effective | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Effective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Effective | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Effective | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Effective | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Effective | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Effective | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() | |
![]() |
Effective | One study |
![]() |
Effective | One study |
![]() |
Effective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Effective | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Effective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() | |
![]() |
Effective | One study |
![]() |
Effective | One study |
![]() |
Effective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Effective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Effective | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Effective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Effective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Effective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
CrimeSolutions’ ratings are assigned from standardized reviews of rigorous evaluations and meta-analyses. While we encourage you to learn more about this process, you don’t need to in order to benefit from it. Our clear ratings and profiles can help you determine if a program or category of program is worth pursuing.
Icon | Rating | Description |
---|---|---|
![]() |
Effective | Implementing the program, or a program encompassed by the practice, will achieve the intended outcome. |
![]() |
Promising | Implementing the program, or a program encompassed by the practice, will achieve the intended outcome. |
![]() |
Ineffective | Implementing the program, or a program encompassed by the practice, will not achieve the intended outcome. |
![]() |
Negative Effects | Implementing the program, or program encompassed by the practice, will not result in intended outcome(s) and may result in harmful effects. |
Programs
Showing Results For:
Topic: drugsTitle | Evidence Rating | Topics | Summary | RCT | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Profile: Modified Therapeutic Community for Individuals With Mental Illness and Chemical Abuse (MICA) Disorders Who Commit Offenses | One study | Mental health, Corrections, Reentry, Correctional facilities, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Drugs | This program is an adaptation of the therapeutic community models for individuals in prison with co-occurring drug and/or alcohol use problems and mental health disorders to reduce substance use, mental illness, and recidivism. The program is rated Promising for reducing criminal activity, reincarceration, drug and alcohol offenses, illegal drug use, alcohol use, and multiple substance use (either legal or illegal). Date Posted: |
None | |||||
Program Profile: Across Ages | Schools, Substance abuse, Truancy, Youth development, Positive youth development, Drug abuse prevention and education, Drugs, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Juvenile delinquency | This is an intergenerational mentoring initiative designed to delay or reduce substance use by increasing the resiliency and protective factors of at-risk middle school youth. The program is rated Ineffective for improving outcomes related to alcohol use, marijuana use, self-control, problem behaviors, school absences, grades, and bonding. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||||||
Program Profile: Multisystemic Therapy–Family Integrated Transitions (MST-FIT) | Mental health, Substance abuse, Reentry, Youth development, Home visiting, Treatment, Young juvenile offenders, Corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Drugs, Drug treatment | This intervention provides integrated individual and family services to juveniles who have co-occurring mental health and chemical dependency disorders during their transition from incarceration back into the community. The program is rated Promising for reducing felony recidivism. Date Posted: |
|||||||
Program Profile: CHOICE | Schools, Alcohol, Underage drinking, School safety, Afterschool, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Substance abuse, Legal substances, Drugs | This is a voluntary afterschool program for middle school aged youths to inform them about substance use and prevent them from starting or continuing alcohol use. The program is rated Effective for reducing alcohol use frequency, and Ineffective for reducing heavy alcohol use and improving alcohol resistance self-efficacy (the self-confidence to resist alcohol). Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||||||
Program Profile: The Pathways Home Foster Care Reunification Intervention | Family reunification, Foster care/child welfare system, Drugs | This is a preventive intervention intended to reunite children returning home to their parents after their first stay in foster care. The program sought to prevent reunification failures when children were returned home to their biological parents by supporting parents and by making the transition a smooth process for both immediate and continued parenting success. The program is rated Promising for improving encouragement strategies. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||||||
Program Profile: JOBSTART | Dropout/expulsion, Truancy, Jobs and workforce development, Drug abuse prevention and education, Drugs, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Employment initiatives | This is a community- and school-based program designed to increase academic skills and job placement in disadvantaged youth. The program is rated Effective for increasing receipt of education or training and increasing receipt of a GED. The program is rated Ineffective for increasing total earnings and employment, reducing receipt of food stamps, and reducing arrests and drug use. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||||||
Program Profile: Lions Quest Skills for Adolescence (SFA) | One study | Schools, Cocaine, Marijuana, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, School climate, Drug abuse prevention and education, Drugs, Illegal substances, Legal substances | This is a school-based life skills training curriculum aimed at developing middle-school students’ social skills and competencies for resisting and reducing tobacco, alcohol, and other drug use. The program is rated Promising for reducing marijuana use. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | |||||
Program Profile: CHAT (Motivational Interviewing for Adolescents At-Risk for Substance Use) | Marijuana, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Legal substances | This program uses motivational interviewing in primary care settings for adolescents at risk for substance use. The program is rated Effective for reducing the number of negative consequences experienced as a result of alcohol use and the number of negative consequences experienced as a result of marijuana use. The program is rated Ineffective for increasing one’s belief in their ability to resist using a substance, reducing alcohol use and marijuana use, and time around substance using peers. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||||||
Program Profile: Stepped Collaborative Care for Adolescents (Washington State) | Alcohol, Mental health, Substance abuse, Children exposed to violence, Trauma, Treatment, Legal substances, Drugs | This is an inpatient/outpatient integrated care intervention for injured adolescents designed to reduce violence risk behaviors as well as posttraumatic stress disorder and depressive symptoms by providing a variety of services to adolescents following a traumatic physical injury. The program is rated Promising for reducing weapon carrying. Date Posted: |
None | ||||||
Program Profile: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Plus Mindfulness Meditation for Adolescent Alcohol Consumption (Australia) |
|
Schools, Alcohol, Underage drinking, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Substance abuse, Legal substances, Drugs, Promising Evidence Rating | This program uses psycho–social and present-moment awareness techniques to target adolescents’ alcohol-related cognitions and prevent their alcohol use. The program is rated Promising. Adolescents who received the intervention had reduced growth of alcohol consumption, compared with adolescents in the control group. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in both negative and positive alcohol expectancies and drinking refusal self-efficacy. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | |||||
Program Profile: Imprisonment for Individuals Who Committed a Drunk Driving Offense (New South Wales, Australia) |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Alcohol, Prisons, Corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Courts, Traffic laws, Traffic law enforcement, Law enforcement, Substance abuse, Legal substances, Drugs, No Effects Evidence Rating | This involves prison time for individuals who have committed drunk-driving offenses to reduce their risk of recidivism upon their release. The program is rated Ineffective. There was no statistically significant difference between individuals in the treatment group (who received prison time) and the comparison group (who received a suspended imprisonment sentence) on reoffending with a driving-while-under-the-influence-of-alcohol offense within 6 months’, 24 months’, or 5 years’ time. Date Posted: |
None | |||||
Program Profile: Young Adult Family Check-Up (YA-FCU) |
|
Schools, Juvenile health, Mental health, Youth development, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Drugs, Substance abuse, No Effects Evidence Rating | The program focuses on the relationship between young adults and their parents to prevent substance misuse and other high-risk behaviors and enhance protective factors such as improving communication and strengthening familial relationships, encouraging healthy peer and romantic relationships, and promoting self-efficacy. The program is rated Ineffective. It made no statistically significant impact on reducing the risk level for a problematic transition into young adulthood. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | |||||
Program Profile: New Orientation for Reducing Threats to Health from Secretive-problems That Affect Readiness (NORTH STAR) |
|
Alcohol, Prescription drugs, Treatment, Military personnel, Crime prevention, Substance abuse, Drugs, Drug treatment | This is a prevention planning and implementation system designed to improve risk and protective factors, and reduce secretive problems, in military communities. The program is rated Ineffective. There were no statistically significant differences between the bases assigned to NORTH STAR and the comparison bases on measures of physical or emotional interpersonal violence/partner abuse, physical or emotional child abuse, hazardous drinking, suicidality, or prescription drug misuse. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | |||||
Program Profile: North Dakota’s 24/7 Sobriety Program |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Drug testing, Probation, Law enforcement, Sanctions, Traffic laws, Traffic law enforcement, Crime prevention, Legal substances, Substance abuse, Drugs | This program seeks to reduce the rearrests of individuals previously convicted of driving while under the influence (DUI) of alcohol or drugs through intensive testing and monitoring of drug and alcohol consumption. The program is rated Promising. There was a statistically significant decrease in the rates of DUI arrests by roughly 9 percent in counties that implemented the program, compared with counties that did not implement the program. Date Posted: |
None | |||||
Program Profile: Risk Reduction through Family Therapy (RRFT) for Adolescents |
|
Mental health, Substance abuse, Children exposed to violence, Trauma, Treatment, Rape and sexual assault, Violent crime, Crisis response, Juvenile (under 18), Drugs, Drug treatment | The goal of this exposure-based, integrative intervention was to reduce substance use and mental health problems in adolescents who have experienced trauma. The program is rated Promising. The program had a statistically significant impact on depressive and internalizing symptoms, family cohesion, and family conflict. There were mixed results for PTSD symptoms and substance use. There was no statistically significant impact on externalizing symptoms. Date Posted: |
None | |||||
Program Profile: Community-Level Intervention on Alcohol-Related Motor Vehicle Crashes (Calif.) |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Regulatory offenses, Alcohol, Underage drinking, Law enforcement operations, Law enforcement, Traffic law enforcement, Traffic laws, Legal substances, Drugs | This program was designed to reduce excessive drinking among adolescents and young adults ages 12-25 through community-wide enforcement operations and awareness campaigns. The program is rated Promising. There was a statistically significant reduction in alcohol-related motor vehicle crashes among 15- to 30-year-old drivers in treatment group cities, compared with control group cities. Date Posted: |
None | |||||
Program Profile: Daily Automated Telephony With a Brief Cognitive Intervention for Persons on Parole (Sweden) |
|
Parole, Cell Phones, Mental health, Alcohol, Community corrections, Corrections, Reentry, Legal substances, Drugs | This was an automated telephony program designed for those recently paroled in Sweden that provided immediate feedback to participants and sent daily reports to their parole officers. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group participants reported statistically significantly less alcohol use, drug use, and internalizing behaviors at the 1-month follow-up, compared with control group participants. Date Posted: |
None | |||||
Program Profile: Gender-Specific Drug Treatment Court (Midwestern State) |
|
Probation, Drug courts, Problem-solving courts, Recidivism, Crime prevention | This is a drug court program that provides treatment services to women on probation to reduce their risk of reoffending. The program gives preference to women who have higher need and risk profiles, are mothers, and have substance use problems. The program is rated Promising. Women in the treatment group were statistically significantly less likely to have a new conviction, compared with similar women on probation who did not participate in the program, at the 2-year follow-up. Date Posted: |
None | |||||
Program Profile: The Impact of California’s Proposition 47 (The Reduced Penalties for Some Crimes Initiative) on Recidivism |
|
Mental health, Sentencing guidelines, Drug possession, Prisons, Corrections, Correctional facilities, Drugs, Drug abuse prevention and education, Crime prevention | This is a policy reform passed by California voters to downgrade drug and property offenses from felonies to misdemeanors, to focus prison resources on the most-serious violent offenses, reinvest savings toward prevention, and reduce recidivism. The program is rated Promising. In an evaluation of recidivism, the intervention group had statistically significantly fewer rearrests and reconvictions for any crime or revocation, compared with the control group, at the 1-year follow-up. Date Posted: |
None | |||||
Program Profile: Impact of Statewide Ignition Interlock Laws on Alcohol-Involved Crash Fatalities in the United States |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Alcohol, Vehicles, Crime prevention, Traffic accidents, Legal substances, Drugs | This is a drunk driving prevention initiative that seeks to reduce alcohol-involved crash fatalities by requiring the installation of ignition interlock devices on vehicles of all drivers convicted of driving under the influence. The program is rated Promising. Intervention states with a statewide ignition interlock requirement had a 15 percent decrease in alcohol-involved vehicle crash fatalities, compared with control states. This was a statistically significant difference. Date Posted: |
None | |||||
Program Profile: Web-Based Sexual Assault Risk Reduction (SARR) for College Women |
|
Situational crime prevention, Rape and sexual assault, Violent crime, Crime prevention, Victimization, Campus, Campus Crime, Schools, Substance abuse, Legal substances, Drugs | This was a program for college women who engaged in heavy episodic drinking to provide feedback on their risk perception and resistance to reduce sexual assault. The program is rated Ineffective. Program participants did not statistically significantly differ from those in the control group on measures of incapacitated attempted/completed rape frequency, alcohol-related sexual assault incidents/severity, or use of sexual assault protective behavioral strategies at the 3-month follow-up. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | |||||
Program Profile: Swift and Sure Sanctions Probation Program (Michigan) |
|
Parole, Community corrections, Corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Legal substances, Drugs | This is an alternative-to-incarceration program designed to respond swiftly with sanctions to probation violations of those at high-risk of re-offending. The overall goal is to reduce participants’ recidivism rates. The program is rated Promising. Participants had statistically significant reduction in recidivism rates (overall, misdemeanor, felony, property, drug/alcohol, and other) compared with the comparison group, but there was no statistically significant effects on violent recidivism. Date Posted: |
None | |||||
Program Profile: Motivational Interviewing (MI) Training for Parole Officers in Colorado |
|
Training, Parole, Community corrections, Probation, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Drugs, Violent crime | This is a client-centered counseling approach implemented as a job-training intervention for parole officers in Colorado. The intervention seeks to enhance parole officers’ communication skills to promote motivation for change and reduce recidivism among supervised people on probation. The program is rated Promising. People on probation in the intervention group showed a statistically significant reduction in recidivism outcomes, compared with people on probation in the comparison group. Date Posted: |
None | |||||
Program Profile: Community Reporting Engagement Support and Training (CREST) |
|
Parole, Probation, Mental health, Community corrections, Corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Drugs, Substance abuse | This is an enhanced day reporting center designed to reduce the risk of recidivism in people on probation with mental illnesses. It provides services such as substance abuse treatment and crisis intervention. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group individuals had a statistically significantly lower risk of conviction for any offense, compared with control group participants on standard probation. However, there was no statistically significant effect on the risk of conviction for a felo Date Posted: |
None | |||||
Program Profile: Cooperative Learning |
|
Schools, Underage drinking, School safety, Youth development, School climate, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Drugs | This is a group-based learning approach that seeks to enhance peer relations by increasing opportunities for positive social integration between adolescents. The program is rated Promising. Students in intervention schools reported they were less willing to use alcohol, had fewer deviant peer affiliations, lower perceived student stress and emotional problems, and had higher academic engagement, compared with students in control schools. These differences were statistically significant. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | |||||
Program Profile: Reducing Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) Limits for Motor Vehicle Operations (New Jersey) |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Alcohol, Drugs, Legal substances, Substance abuse, Drugs | This program comprises legislation that was passed to reduce alcohol-related crash fatalities by lowering the blood alcohol concentration limit for adult drivers from 0.10 to 0.08. The program is rated Ineffective. There was a statistically significant reduction in passenger fatalities per crash after the implementation of the legislation; however, there were no statistically significant impacts on driver fatalities per crash or total fatalities per crash. Date Posted: |
None | |||||
Program Profile: Mystery Shop Programs to Reduce Underage Alcohol Sales |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Situational crime prevention, Legal substances, Drugs | This intervention seeks to increase staff ID checks for the sale of alcoholic beverages at licensed establishments, to help prevent sales to minors. The program is rated Effective. The results were mixed. One study found there was a statistically significant increase in age verification rates resulting from the intervention, whereas a second study found no statistically significant increases in ID-checking rates. Overall, the results suggest the intervention influenced ID-checking rates. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | |||||
Program Profile: The Substance Use Prevention Promoted by Eating Family Meals Regularly (SUPPER) Project |
|
Substance abuse, Marijuana, Drugs | This program seeks to help parents become facilitators in preventing children’s substance misuse, by encouraging them to have five or more family meals together weekly. The program is rated Promising. Intervention group parents showed a statistically significant increase in talking with children about alcohol, compared with control group parents, but there were no statistically significant differences in number of family meals per week and talking with children about marijuana and other drugs. Date Posted: |
None | |||||
Program Profile: Operation Regional Analytics for the Safety of Our Residents (RASOR) |
|
|
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() | |
![]() |
Promising | One study |
![]() |
Promising | One study |
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() | |
![]() |
Effective | One study |
![]() |
Effective | One study |
![]() |
Effective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() | |
![]() |
Promising | One study |
![]() |
Promising | One study |
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Effective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Effective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() | |
![]() |
Promising | One study |
![]() |
Promising | One study |
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() | |
![]() |
Promising | One study |
![]() |
Promising | One study |
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() | |
![]() |
Promising | One study |
![]() |
Promising | One study |
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Effective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Negative Effects | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Effective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Effective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Effective | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() | |
![]() |
Negative Effects | One study |
![]() |
Negative Effects | One study |
![]() |
Negative Effects | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Effective | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Effective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Effective | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Effective | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Effective | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Effective | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Effective | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() | |
![]() |
Effective | One study |
![]() |
Effective | One study |
![]() |
Effective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Effective | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Effective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() | |
![]() |
Effective | One study |
![]() |
Effective | One study |
![]() |
Effective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Effective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Effective | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Effective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Effective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Effective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Promising | More than one study |
Date Posted:
![]() |
Ineffective | One study |
Date Posted: