Study 1
Protective Factors
Compared with students in the control group, participants in the treatment group showed improvements on eight of nine protective factors, including appropriate attitudes regarding drug use and aggressive or violent behavior, knowledge of peer norms for substance and violence use, peer group acceptance of substance or violence use, emotional competence/self-efficacy, goal-setting and decision-making skills, social and peer-resistance skills, harmful effects of substance use, and parental disapproval of youth substance use. These differences were statistically significant.
Intention to Use Alcohol
TGFV students indicated a 50-percent reduction in intention to drink alcohol, compared with control group students, at the posttest. This difference was statistically significant.
Intention to Use Marijuana
There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in intention to use marijuana, at the posttest.
Intention to Use Tobacco
There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in intention to use tobacco, at the posttest.
Intention to Engage in Aggressive Behavior
Bacon (2001) found that students who participated in Too Good for Violence (TGFV) indicated a 45-percent reduction in intention to engage in aggressive behaviors, compared with the control group students, at the posttest. This difference was statistically significant.
Study 2
Inappropriate Behavior (Teacher-Reported)
There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in teacher-reported inappropriate behavior (e.g., name calling, yelling, or pushing other students) at the 20-week follow up.
Prosocial Behavior (Teacher-Reported)
Teachers reported higher prosocial behavior (e.g., helping other students) in TGFV students, compared with control group students, at the 20-week follow up. This difference was statistically significant.
Social Skills (Teacher-Reported)
Teachers reported higher social skills (e.g., treating other students with respect) in TGFV students, compared with control group students, at the 20-week follow up. This difference was statistically significant.
Social Interactions with Others (Student-Reported)
There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in student-reported social interactions with others at the 20-week follow up.
Emotional Competency (Student-Reported)
Bacon (2003) found that students who participated in TGFV self-reported higher scores for emotional competency skills (e.g., being able to calm themselves down when upset), compared with control group students, at the 20-week follow up. This difference was statistically significant.
Social and Conflict Resolution (Student-Reported)
TGFV students self-reported higher scores for social and conflict resolution (e.g., resolving conflict in peaceful ways), compared with control group students, at the 20-week follow up. This difference was statistically significant.
Communication Skills (Student-Reported)
TGFV students self-reported higher scores for communication skills (e.g., using “I feel” statements to share feelings), compared with control group students, at the 20-week follow up. This difference was statistically significant.