Program Profile: Delaware KEY/Crest Substance Abuse Programs

This program uses a drug treatment continuum of prison-based therapeutic community and residential work release for drug-involved convicted persons. The program is rated Promising. Results showed statistically significant increases in remaining drug-free after 3 years and increases in condom use after 6 months; however, there were no statistically significant effects in being injection-free (after 6 months) or arrest-free (after 3 years).

A Promising rating implies that implementing the program may result in the intended outcome(s).

Program Goals/Target Population

KEY/CREST is a corrections- and community-based multistage substance abuse treatment program for drug-involved convicted persons. The Delaware Department of Correction (DOC) provides a continuum of primary (in prison), secondary (work release), and tertiary (aftercare) therapeutic community treatment for drug-involved convicted persons. Each stage in the continuum corresponds to the person’s changing correctional status: incarceration, work release, and parole or community supervision.

The substance abuse treatment programs offered by the DOC allow for drug-involved convicted persons to go through the KEY Program and the CREST Outreach Centers. Alternatively, convicted persons can participate in the CREST Outreach Centers without participating in the KEY Program. This CrimeSolutions review was focused on the program that allows convicted persons to participate in the KEY Program, followed by participation in the CREST Outreach Centers.

Program Components

KEY Program. KEY is the first component of the DOC’s substance abuse treatment continuum. It is a prison-based, therapeutic community program designed as a total treatment environment that is discipline-based and isolated from the rest of the prison population. The treatment perspective of the KEY program is that drug abuse is a disorder; addiction is the symptom, not the essence of the disorder. Therefore, the primary goal of KEY is to change negative patterns of behavior, thinking, and feelings that predispose a convicted persons toward drug abuse. Incarcerated persons receive behavioral, cognitive, and emotional therapy that focuses on changing behavior first and emotion last.

Incarcerated persons typically become involved in the KEY program during the last 12 to 18 months of incarceration. They are provided with a routine that is disciplined and regimented and are required to complete program assignments that are seen as essential to treatment. KEY staff members provide oversight to treatment programming, which is scheduled 7 days a week. Incarcerated persons have access to staff counselors every day, if they feel the need to discuss issues related to their treatment and recovery. Incarcerated persons also meet twice a week with their caseload group (other Incarcerated persons program participants) to discuss issues related to recovery.

CREST Outreach Centers. CREST is the second component of the substance abuse program. The CREST Outreach Centers are residential work-release centers based on the therapeutic community model, which allow convicted persons recovering from substance abuse to continue their treatment as they transition into the community. Typically, convicted persons work during the day and return to their assigned center at night for therapy, counseling, or treatment.

The CREST program is usually 6 months in duration. The first 3 months are spent entirely at the CREST Center, where convicted persons engage in full-time substance abuse treatment. During the next 3 months, convicted persons become involved in the work-release portion of the program and go through the following phases:

• Entry, evaluation, and orientation: Convicted persons get used to life outside of prison.
• Primary: Counselors and convicted persons explore the challenges and issues faced by individuals and prepare appropriate responses to minimize the likelihood of relapse.
• Job-seeking: Convicted persons develop job seeking and interview skills.
• Work release: Convicted persons maintain residence at CREST while working in the community.

Additional Information

View the program profiles for:

• Delaware CREST Outreach Centers
• Delaware KEY Substance Abuse Program

Study

A follow-up study by Martin and colleagues (1999) looked at the outcome results 1 year and 3 years after participants left work release. The study examined the same four groups as the previous study by Martin, Butzin, and Inciardi (1995). The study authors also looked at results from participants who received no in-prison treatment, were assigned to regular work release, were CREST dropouts, were CREST graduates without aftercare, and were CREST graduates with aftercare. However, the CrimeSolutions review of this study focused on the comparisons between the initial KEY-CREST group (n = 68) and the initial comparison group (n = 165).

The comparison group was predominately male (82 percent), 68 percent African American, 27 percent white, and 4 percent Hispanic. Their average age was 29 years. The KEY-CREST group was 74 percent male, 85 percent African American, and 13 percent white. Their average age was 31.

The outcome measures of interest were relapse (drug-free) and recidivism (arrest-free). Each outcome variable combined information from repeated self-report and official data. To be considered drug-free, the study participant must have reported no illegal drug use and tested negative for drugs on the urine screen at every follow-up point. Similarly, arrest-free was measured as no self-reports of arrest and no official arrest record for new offenses since release from prison (excluding parole violations). The study authors relied on bivariate and multivariate logistic regression to analyze the data and did not conduct subgroup analyses of KEY-CREST participants.

Study

The first study by Martin, Butzin, and Inciardi (1995) used a quasi-experimental design to examine the differences among 457 subjects, recruited between the summer of 1990 and the spring of 1994, who participated in the following conditions:

• Primary treatment in prison at KEY program with no subsequent treatment (KEY group, n = 43)
• Primary treatment in prison at KEY program and secondary (transitional) treatment at CREST Outreach Center (KEY-CREST group, n = 32)
• Primary treatment at CREST with no prior prison-based treatment (CREST, n = 176)
• No treatment other than HIV/AIDS prevention education (comparison, n = 206)

Subjects in the KEY-CREST group were not assigned randomly, but by prison personnel who determined eligibility based on institutional classification screening, criminal history, and correctional counselor interviews.

The CrimeSolutions review of this study focused on the comparisons between the KEY-CREST group and the no- treatment (other than HIV/AIDS prevention education) comparison group.

The sample was mostly male (81 percent), African American (72 percent), with the remaining participants mostly white. There were a few statistically significant differences between the groups at baseline. The KEY-CREST group included more African American participants who, on average, had longer criminal histories. Also, all of the KEY-CREST subjects were male, as there was no therapeutic community available for female Incarcerated persons at the time. There were no other statistically significant differences between the treatment and comparison group on baseline characteristics.

Subjects were interviewed just prior to leaving prison and again about 6 months after release. Self-reported measures were collected on sexual activities, criminal history, drug abuse treatment history, psychosocial and mental health status, and sociodemographics. The two outcome measures of interest were intended as a rough index of risk of HIV infection. One measure was the use of any injection drugs since release, and the other measure was report of condom use. The primary mode of statistical analysis was logistic regression, with additional chi-square analyses.

Two other outcomes of interest, drug-free and arrest-free, were measured at a later timepoint (Martin et al. 1999). The study authors did not conduct subgroup analyses.

These sources were used in the development of the program profile:

These sources were used in the development of the program profile:

Following are CrimeSolutions-rated programs that are related to this practice:

Incarceration-based Therapeutic Communities for Adults

This practice uses a comprehensive, residential drug treatment program model for treating substance-abusing and addicted inmates to foster changes in attitudes, perceptions, and behaviors related to substance use. The practice is rated Promising in reducing recidivism rates after release for participants in therapeutic communities.

Evidence Ratings for Outcomes

Crime & Delinquency - Multiple crime/offense types

Adult Reentry Programs

This practice involves correctional programs that focus on the transition of individuals from prison into the community. Reentry programs involve treatment or services that have been initiated while the individual is in custody and a follow-up component after the individual is released. The practice is rated Promising for reducing recidivism.

Evidence Ratings for Outcomes

Crime & Delinquency - Multiple crime/offense types

Rehabilitation Programs for Adults Convicted of a Crime

This practice includes programs that are designed to reduce recidivism among adults by improving their behaviors, skills, mental health, social functioning, and access to education and employment. They may become participants in rehabilitation programs during multiple points in their involvement with the criminal justice system. This practice is rated Promising for reducing recidivism among adults who have been convicted of an offense.

Evidence Ratings for Outcomes

Crime & Delinquency - Multiple crime/offense types

Why might a practice's outcome ratings differ from the ratings of specific programs encompassed by that practice?