Reentry
Knowing what to do starts with knowing what works, and what hasn't. CrimeSolutions helps practitioners and policymakers understand what programs & practices work, are promising, or haven't worked yet.
On this page you can find programs and practices related to Reentry. Select "Search Filters" to narrow down the list by rating, extent of evidence, and many other aspects of the programs or practices. Skip to Practices
CrimeSolutions’ ratings are assigned from standardized reviews of rigorous evaluations and meta-analyses. While we encourage you to learn more about this process, you don’t need to in order to benefit from it. Our clear ratings and profiles can help you determine if a program or category of program is worth pursuing.
| Icon | Rating | Program Rating Description | Practice Rating Description |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Effective | Implementing the program is likely to result in the intended outcome(s). | On average, there is strong evidence that implementing a program encompassed by the practice will achieve the intended outcome. |
|
|
Promising | Implementing the program may result in the intended outcome(s) | On average, there is some evidence that implementing a program encompassed by the practice will achieve the intended outcome. |
|
|
No Effects | Implementing the program is unlikely to result in the intended outcome(s) and may result in a negative outcome(s). | On average, there is strong evidence that implementing a program encompassed by the practice will not achieve the intended outcome or may result in a negative outcome. |
Programs
Showing Results For:
Topic: Reentry| Title | Evidence Rating | Topics | Summary | RCT | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Profile: Prisoner Rehabilitation Authority Vocational Support and Supervision Program (Israel) |
|
Parole, Mental health, Corrections, Reentry, Community corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Employment initiatives, Inmate assistance programs, Rape and sexual assault, Effective Evidence Rating | This program provides community supervision and services to individuals released early from prison to help them find employment and reduce their recidivism. The program is rated Effective. Program participants were less likely to be reincarcerated and had higher rates of integration into the workforce, compared with individuals who did not participate in the program. These differences were statistically significant. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Denver (Colorado) Supportive Housing Social Impact Bond Initiative (Denver SIB) |
|
Corrections, Jails, Correctional facilities | This is a program for homeless individuals who are often in jail, to increase their housing stability and reduce their criminal justice involvement. The program is rated Effective. Individuals in the treatment group had statistically significant reductions in arrest, jail stays, days in jail, and shelter stays and visits, and statistically significant increases in mental health services, compared with the control group, but there was no statistically significant effect on substance use services. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Reentry Services of Clay County (Minnesota) |
|
Probation, Mental health, Substance abuse, Reentry, Case Management, Treatment, Comprehensive/wraparound services, Access to education, Corrections, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice, Juvenile (under 18), Mentoring, Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency | This is a one-to-one mentoring program aimed at improving public safety by assisting youths who commit offenses with comprehensive reentry services following their release into the community. The program is rated No Effects. There was no statistically significant difference between program and comparison group youths in prevalence of reoffense. Program youths had statistically significantly fewer official juvenile justice contacts within 1 year of release, compared with comparison group youth Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Oklahoma's Juvenile Second Chance Act Reentry Program (Tulsa, OK) |
|
Reentry, Case Management, Corrections, Juvenile recidivism prediction, Crime prevention, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile justice, Juvenile detention | This is a juvenile reentry program that offers services to youth returning to the community in Tulsa, Okla., after their out-of-home placements. The goal of the program is to reduce rates of recidivism for high-risk youth. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences in reconviction rates for treatment group youth who received the program’s services, compared with comparison group youth who did not receive services. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Daily Automated Telephony With a Brief Cognitive Intervention for Persons on Parole (Sweden) |
|
Parole, Cell Phones, Mental health, Alcohol, Community corrections, Corrections, Reentry, Legal substances, Drugs | This was an automated telephony program designed for those recently paroled in Sweden that provided immediate feedback to participants and sent daily reports to their parole officers. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group participants reported statistically significantly less alcohol use, drug use, and internalizing behaviors at the 1-month follow-up, compared with control group participants. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Creating Lasting Family Connections Fatherhood Program: Family Reintegration |
|
Reentry, Recidivism, Corrections, Crime prevention, Drugs | This is a community-based program for adult males who received substance abuse treatment while incarcerated and are reentering the community. The goals are to reduce recidivism, substance abuse, and HIV/hepatitis infection rates, and promote fatherhood and relationship skills. This program is rated Promising. Program participants had a statistically significant lower likelihood of recidivating and demonstrated an increase in relationship skills, compared with the comparison group members. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Harlem (NY) Parole Reentry Court |
|
Parole, Probation, Reentry courts, Prisons, Corrections, Specialty/problem-solving courts, Corrections, Community corrections, Inmate programs | This is a reentry program designed to assist parolees transition from life in prison to life in the community. The program is rated Promising. The treatment group had statistically significant reductions in rates of reconvictions and parole revocations, increases in numbers of months employed, and a greater likelihood of receiving a high school diploma or GED, compared with the control group. However, there were no statistically significant differences in rate of rearrests or substance use. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Veterans Moving Forward (San Diego, Calif.) |
|
Mental health, Recidivism, Crime prevention | This program is designed to assist incarcerated male veterans of the U.S. military by providing them with in-custody treatment, services, and linkage to rehabilitative programming and community resources and reduce their chances of recidivism. The program is rated Promising. Results showed a statistically significant reduction in recidivism for program participants during the 12-month follow-up period, compared with the comparison group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Delaware CREST Outreach Centers |
|
Parole, Probation, Mental health, Alcohol-Related Offenses, Corrections, Correctional facilities, Reentry, Drugs | This is a residential work-release program that uses therapy, counseling and treatment for persons convicted of a crime with a history of substance use who are reentering society. The program is rated Promising. There were statistically significant increases in participants being injection-free at 6 months and being drug-free after 3 years; however, there were no statistically significant effects in condom use (at 6 months) or being arrest-free (after 3 years). Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Second Chance Act (SCA) Adult Reentry Demonstration Programs |
|
Parole, Probation, Mental health, Reentry courts, Community corrections, Corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Employment initiatives | This is a program designed to reduce recidivism and improve employment rates through reentry services for individuals who have a moderate-to-high risk for reoffending. The program is rated No Effects. At the 30-month follow up, there were no statistically significant differences in rearrest, reconviction, reincarceration, or employment rates between program participants and control group members. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: YouthBuild Offender Program |
|
Diversion, Reentry, Youth development, Jobs and workforce development, Positive youth development, Treatment, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice, Juvenile (under 18), Young adults (18-24), Employment initiatives | The program provides education, vocational training, and other youth-development services to low-income youths, ages 16–24, who have been convicted of a crime. The program is rated Promising. The program statistically significantly reduced recidivism and increased the likelihood of receiving a high school diploma, GED, trade license, or training certificate. However, there were no effects on enrollment in postsecondary courses, employment, or certain measures of youth development. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: High-Risk Revocation Reduction (HRRR) Program in Minnesota |
|
Prisons, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Intimate partner violence, Violent crime | This is an adult reentry program designed to reduce recidivism among high-risk males who were previously released from a state prison but returned to prison for violating conditions of their supervised release. The program is rated Promising. The program was shown to have a statistically significant effect on reducing revocation and reconviction; however, it did not have a statistically significant effect on reducing rearrests and reincarceration. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Milwaukee Safe Streets Prisoner Release Initiative (PRI) |
|
Mental health, Prisons, Reentry, Employment initiatives, Inmate assistance programs | This program combines enhanced employment opportunities and wraparound services for incarcerated persons before and after release from prison. The program is rated Promising. There was a statistically significant reduction in likelihood of rearrests for program group participants, compared with the control group. There was also a lower rate of reimprisonment for program participants than nonparticipants; however, this difference was not statistically significant. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Functional Family Parole |
|
Parole, Mental health, Reentry, Treatment, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice, Child health and welfare, Employment initiatives, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a supervision program that incorporates family-focused, strengths-based principles of Functional Family Therapy. The goal of the program is to reduce re-arrests and increase employment rates. The program is rated Promising. Participants in the intervention were less likely to be re-arrested, more likely to be employed, and earned more per quarter, compared with the comparison group. These findings were statistically significant. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Gender-Responsive Intervention for Female Juvenile Offenders |
|
Girls, Mental health, Substance abuse, Reentry, Treatment, Probation, Community corrections, Corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile detention | This program provided gender-responsive services in two group homes for female youths who had been adjudicated in the delinquency (formal probation) or truancy divisions of juvenile court. The program is rated Promising. Results showed a statistically significant difference in that the girls who received gender-responsive services had lower recidivism rates after 2 years, compared with the comparison group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Intensive Outpatient Program (IOP) and Non-Hospital Residential (NHR) Program |
|
Parole, Corrections, Community corrections, Reentry, Crime prevention, Recidivism | These were community-based, substance abuse treatment programs for recently paroled, substance-dependent individuals. The primary aim of the programs was to treat participants’ substance abuse in the community while reducing their likelihood of reoffending. The program is rated Promising. Program participants were less likely to be convicted of a new crime, when compared with the community comparison group; this was a statistically significant difference. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Mentally Ill Offender Community Transition Program (Washington) |
|
Parole, Probation, Mental health, Prisons, Correctional facilities, Corrections, Reentry, Inmate programs, Recidivism, Crime prevention | The program is targeted at individuals whose mental illnesses are seen as instrumental in their offenses, and who are likely to qualify for and benefit from publicly supported treatment in the community. The overall goal is to reduce recidivism . The program is rated Effective. Participants in the program were less likely to be convicted of any new offense and convicted of felony offenses, compared with the matched comparison group. The difference was statistically significant. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Discretionary Parole in New Jersey |
|
Parole, Prisons, Reentry, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Sentencing, Courts | This allows individuals to be released early from a prison in New Jersey and complete the remainder of their sentences under supervision, with the goal of reducing recidivism. The program is rated Promising. The treatment group released early from prison had statistically significantly lower rates of reconviction, number of days until reconviction, re-arrests, and days to re-arrest, compared with those who had completed their entire sentences and were unconditionally released to the community. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Intensive Supervision for Persons on Probation at High-Risk of Committing Offenses (California) |
|
Probation, Federal parole guidelines, Community corrections, Reentry | This is an enhanced probation intervention targeted at high-risk individuals in three counties in California. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant effects of the intervention on rearrest. At one site, the treatment group had statistically significantly more technical violations, than the comparison group; however, there were no statistically significant effects on technical violation rates at the other two sites. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Returning Home - Ohio (RHO) Pilot Program |
|
Parole, Probation, Mental health, Community corrections, Prisons, Correctional facilities, Reentry, Crime prevention | This program linked incarcerated persons who had disabilities and were at risk for homelessness to supportive housing upon their release from prison. The goal was to reduce recidivism, homelessness, and multiple systems use. The program is rated Promising. The program was shown to statistically significantly reduce the probability of rearrest (but not re-incarceration) and length of time from release to rearrest; however, treatment group participants were rearrested more frequently. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Skillman Intensive Aftercare Program (Pittsburgh and Detroit) |
|
Reentry, Case Management, Comprehensive/wraparound services, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice, Juvenile (under 18) | This was an aftercare program in Pittsburgh (Penn.) and Detroit (Mich.) for juveniles transitioning out of a residential correctional program. The intent of the program was to decrease instances of reconviction and re-arrest among participating youths after their release into the community. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant effects on rates of reconviction and rearrest among program participants in either city. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Earned Early Release (Washington State) |
|
Parole, Probation, Sentencing guidelines, Courts, Prisons, Corrections, Correctional facilities, Reentry, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Intimate partner violence, Violent crime | Under a 2003 Washington State law, incarcerated individuals who had committed certain nonviolent offenses were able to acquire earlier release time of up to 50 percent of their maximum sentence. The program is rated Promising. Individuals who were released early under the law had a statistically significant lower rate of felony convictions, compared with individuals who were not released early; however, there was no statistically significant difference on violent convictions. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Florida Work Release Program |
|
Corrections, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Sentencing, Courts, Inmate assistance programs, Employment initiatives, Reentry | This reentry program allows individuals who are nearing the end of their custodial sentences to work regular jobs in the community. The program is based in work release centers in participants’ counties of residence in Florida. The program is rated as Promising. The program was found to have a statistically significant effect on reducing reconvictions of participants and increasing their employment and quarterly earnings post-release. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: North Carolina Vocational Delivery System |
|
Crime prevention, Recidivism, Employment initiatives, Inmate assistance programs | This program was designed to assist justice-involved young adults (ages 18 to 22) in obtaining postrelease employment. It involved an integrated system of vocational training and reentry services to reduce the rate of rearrest after release. This program is rated No Effects. Results suggest there were no statistically significant differences in measures of recidivism and employment between young adults who participated in the program, compared with those who did not participate. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Minnesota Prison Work Release Program |
|
Reentry, Corrections, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Employment initiatives, Inmate assistance programs | This program was designed to help individuals make a successful transition from prison to the community through provision of stable housing and support to obtain employment. The program is rated Promising. Program participants had a statistically significant decrease in rearrest, reconviction, and reincarceration rates, and an improvement in employment and number of hours worked. However, participants also had a statistically significant higher likelihood of revocations for technical violations. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Brief Motivational Interviewing for Alcohol Use (Incarcerated Women) |
|
Alcohol, Prisons, Correctional facilities, Corrections, Community corrections, Reentry, Substance abuse, Legal substances, Drugs | This program was designed to provide an alcohol intervention to incarcerated women with hazardous drinking habits who were being released from prison. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between the treatment and comparison groups on the number of days abstinent from alcohol consumption at the 6-month follow up. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Philadelphia (Penn.) Intensive Aftercare Probation Program |
|
Probation, Reentry, Violent offenders, Case Management, Corrections, Community corrections, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice, Juvenile detention | This program was an intensive alternative reintegration program for high-risk male juveniles who were being released to probation from a juvenile corrections facility. The program is rated Promising. Results showed that while there were no differences between the treatment and comparison groups on the percent who had been re-arrested during the 9-month follow up, the treatment group had a statistically significantly lower number of re-arrests than the comparison group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Indianapolis (Indiana) Reentry Project |
|
Parole, Probation, Community corrections, Corrections, Prisons | This was a reentry program in which individuals returning from prison were ordered by their parole or probation officers to participate in a 1-hour meeting within 90 days of their release. The meetings were meant to convey an intolerance for violence in the community and to allow the individuals to connect with service providers. The program is rated No Effects. The program was shown to have no statistically significant effects on the likelihood of rearrest and the time to rearrest. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: College Program at Maryland Correctional Training Center (MCTC) |
|
Corrections, Reentry, Inmate programs, Crime prevention, Recidivism | This program offered postsecondary education for incarcerated individuals to reduce or break the cycle of continued or repeated criminal behavior. The program is rated Promising. Participants in the program had a statistically significant lower rate of arrests for a new crime than comparison group members. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Social Support Treatment with Drug Testing (Maryland) |
|
Drug testing, Parole, Cocaine, Heroin, Corrections, Community corrections, Reentry, Crime prevention, Substance abuse, Cocaine, Opioids | This program involves social support integrated with regular drug testing for recently paroled individuals who have a history of heroin and cocaine abuse. The program is rated Promising. Program participants had a statistically significant lower rate of reconviction, arrest, and incarceration, compared with the comparison group; however, there were no statistically significant effects on employment. Program participants also had a statistically significant higher positive drug-testing rate. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Serious and Violent Offender Reentry Initiative (Midwestern State) |
|
Parole, Probation, Prisons, Community corrections, Corrections | This program provides enhanced reentry services to support parolees with successful transition back into the community. The program follows the principles of the risk-needs-responsivity model by targeting services to those with highest risk, addressing dynamic risk factors, and emphasizing cognitive-behavioral strategies throughout the program. The program is rated Promising. The program was found to have a statistically significant effect on reconviction, but no effect on return to prison. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Avon Park Youth Academy and STREET Smart Aftercare Program |
|
Training, Mental health, Diversion, Intake/assessment, Jobs and workforce development, Young juvenile offenders, Access to education, Reentry, Corrections, Correctional facilities, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice, Inmate assistance programs, Employment initiatives | This program was located at a secure-custody residential facility that provided educational and vocational training to moderate-risk male youth. The program is rated No Effects. Participants showed a statistically significant greater likelihood of obtaining a degree, compared with nonparticipants. However, there were no statistically significant differences in any arrest for any offense overall and felony arrest specifically, employment, time employed, or higher education enrollment. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Texas Intensive Supervision Parole (Houston and Dallas) |
|
Burglary, Larceny/theft, Assault, Homicide, Robbery, Drug testing, Parole, Drug possession, Community corrections, Prisons, Reentry | This program was designed to increase monitoring and control of persons on parole who demonstrated poor parole performance and were at high risk of returning to prison for a parole violation. This program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences in reconviction, rearrest, and employment rates between groups in both Houston and Dallas. In Houston, program participants were significantly more likely to have technical violations than those in the control group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Wayne County (Michigan) Second Chance Reentry Program |
|
Mental health, Reentry, Case Management, Comprehensive/wraparound services, Corrections, Inmate programs, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice | This is a reentry program designed to reduce recidivism and increase reentry services for males, ages 13 to 18, who have committed offenses and are placed in a locked, residential treatment facility. The program is rated Promising. The program was shown to statistically significantly decrease recidivism rates among youths who participated in the program, compared with youths who received services as usual. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Serious and Violent Offender Reentry Initiative (North Dakota) |
|
Parole, Corrections, Community corrections | This program provides enhanced reentry services to support persons on parole with successful transition back into the community. Services include chemical dependency treatment, psychiatric treatment, educational training, and assistance in finding housing. The program is rated Promising. The program was found to have a statistically significant, moderate effect on rearrest, but no statistically significant effect on revocation of parole. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Collaborative Behavioral Management in Six Sites |
|
Parole, Corrections, Community corrections, Reentry, Drugs, Substance abuse | This program involved collaborative sessions among a parole officer, treatment counselor, and the person on parole. The intervention provided parole officers with positive tools to manage the behavior of people on parole. The program aimed to reduce substance use, crime, and re-arrest among drug-involved people on parole. The program is rated No Effects. Results showed that the intervention did not significantly reduce re-arrest or overall drug use. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Regional Treatment Centre Sex Offender Treatment Program (Canada) |
|
Sex offenders, Sex offender management, Corrections, Prisons, Reentry, Inmate programs, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Rape and sexual assault, Violent crime, Crime prevention | This inpatient program provides group and individual therapy to those who have committed sexual offenses and have recently been released from prison in Ontario, Canada. The program is rated No Effects. There was no significant difference in sexual recidivism rates between the treatment group and the comparison group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Challenge Incarceration Program (CIP) |
|
Prisons, Corrections, Reentry, Inmate programs | This boot camp intervention in Minnesota combines a traditional military institutional program for 6 months with two 6-month phases of intensive, supervised release aftercare. The program is rated Promising. Program participants had statistically significant lower rates of re-arrest, felony reconviction, and return to prison for a new offense than the comparison group, but no statistically significant difference in the rate of return to prison for any offense. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: San Diego (Calif.) Prisoner Reentry Program |
|
Parole, Community corrections, Prisons, Corrections, Crime prevention, Recidivism | The program, established by Senate Bill 618, aimed to educate and rehabilitate incarcerated individuals who committed nonviolent felony offenses in an effort to reduce recidivism and revocations to prison. The program is rated No Effects. There was a statistically significant impact on program participants’ rates of rearrest. However, there were no statistically significant differences on reconviction and return to prison rates between program participants and those who were not in the program. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Opportunity to Succeed (OPTS) |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Reentry, Corrections, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Intimate partner violence, Violent crime | This program was designed to reduce relapse and criminal recidivism by providing comprehensive aftercare services to individuals convicted of felonies, with alcohol- and drug-related histories. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant program effects on rearrests, substance abuse relapse, or employment. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Back Door Electronic Monitoring (Sweden) |
|
Reentry, Community corrections, Corrections, Prisons, Sentencing, Courts | This program in Sweden involves the use of an ankle bracelet to determine the location of an individual who has been released following a short-term stay in prison. The overall goal is to reduce reoffending rates of participants. The program is rated Promising. Significantly fewer program participants were convicted of a new offense and sentenced to prison at the 3-year follow up, compared with control group participants. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: High Intensity Training (HIT) Regime at Thorn Cross Young Offenders Institution (England) |
|
Reentry, Corrections | This program is a correctional boot camp that combines elements of military training with elements of rehabilitation to prepare individuals ages 18 to 21 (considered “young offenders”) for reentry into their communities. The program is rated No Effects. At the 10-year follow up, there was no statistically significant impact on reconviction rates. Program participants had a statistically significant fewer number of reconvictions, compared with the control group; however, the difference was small. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Enhanced Thinking Skills (England) |
|
Corrections, Correctional facilities, Prisons, Reentry, Inmate programs | This is a prison-based, cognitive–behavioral skills enhancement program in England. The program is rated Effective. Program participants showed statistically significant reductions in reconviction rates and frequency of reoffending, compared with nonparticipants. However, there was no statistically significant difference between groups in severe offense reconviction rates. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Recovery Management Checkups for Women Offenders (Cook County, Ill.) |
|
Jails, Correctional facilities, Corrections, Reentry, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Legal substances, Drugs | This intervention linked women who committed nonviolent offenses to community-based, substance use treatment after release from jail. It was designed to reduce recidivism and alcohol and drug use, and to promote long-term recovery. This program is rated No Effects. The treatment group had a statistically significant greater likelihood of participating in substance use treatment; however, there were no significant effects for recidivism, alcohol and drug use, or number of days spent in jail. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Community Mediation Maryland Re-Entry Mediation |
|
Corrections, Community corrections, Inmate programs, Crime prevention | This program brings together inmates, their families, and other supporters to discuss inmates’ past experiences and future expectations in a mediated session. The session is designed to facilitate communication, understanding, and a plan for reentry to help inmates successfully transition into the community after release. The program is rated Promising. This program showed a statistically significant reduction in rearrest, reconviction, and return to prison for program participants. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Minnesota's Enhanced Supervision Release Program |
|
Parole, Probation, Community corrections, Corrections, Reentry, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Diversion, Courts | This was an intensive, supervised release program for persons at high risk for reoffense and who were mandated to residential treatment upon release from prison. The program gradually reduced restrictions as the persons on parole transitioned back into the community. The program is rated No Effects. Results showed no statistically significant effects on recidivism measures, including rearrest, revocation for technical violations, reconviction, and days in prison. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Residential Aftercare Component of Quehanna (PA) Motivational Boot Camp Program |
|
Drug testing, Mental health, Corrections, Reentry, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Drugs | This program provides residential aftercare services for those with substance abuse issues who have completed the 6-month Quehanna (PA) Motivational Boot Camp Program. The program is rated No Effects. An examination of the impact of both 30- and 90-day aftercare programs found no statistically significant effects of treatment of either dosage on recidivism. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Quehanna (PA) Motivational Boot Camp |
|
Drug testing, Mental health, Corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Rape and sexual assault | This 6-month program aims to reduce recidivism by diverting eligible candidates from prison to a boot camp that promotes discipline, structure, and characteristics of good citizenship and seeks to improve skills for reentry into the community. The program is rated Promising. Boot camp participants had statistically significantly lower rates of recidivism (measured as both rearrest and reincarceration) compared with nonparticipants at the 3-year follow-up. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Wichita (Kansas) Work Release Program |
|
Reentry, Corrections, Crime prevention, Recidivism | This is a reentry program designed to facilitate selected individuals’ transition from incarceration to community living by providing work opportunities outside of correctional facilities and less structured housing alternatives. The program is rated Promising. Program completers had statistically significantly lower recidivism rates, compared with comparison group members who did not participate in the program, at the 3-year follow-up period. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Ohio's Progressive Sanctioning Grid |
|
Corrections, Community corrections, Courts | This program uses progressive sanction guidelines from the Ohio Adult Parole Authority to determine the appropriate amount of response by authorities with regard to individuals who violate supervision. The program is rated No Effects. There was no statistically significant impact on risk of felony reoffending and major violation behavior in the first year of supervision. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Alameda County (Calif.) Integrated Dual Disorders Treatment Program |
|
Mental health, Jails, Correctional facilities, Corrections, Crime prevention | This is a post-custody, community-based intervention for individuals with co-occurring mental illness and substance use disorders. The program is rated No Effects. While the program statistically significantly reduced the number of reconvictions and incarcerations, it did not impact the number of arrests, days in jail, felony convictions, or percent of reconvictions. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Connections Program (San Diego, Calif.) |
|
Mental health, Jails, Corrections, Reentry | This program used coordinated service teams to support mentally ill individuals leaving prison in transitioning back into the community. The program is rated No Effects. Program participants showed a statistically significant lower likelihood of returning to jail during the program treatment period. However, there were no statistically significant effects on reconvictions during the program treatment period or return to jail at the 6-month follow up. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: EMPLOY (Minnesota) |
|
Prisons, Inmate programs, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Employment initiatives, Inmate assistance programs | This is a prisoner-reentry employment program designed to reduce recidivism by helping participants find and retain employment after release from prison. The program is rated Promising. Participants had statistically significant lower rates of reconviction, rearrest, reincarceration, and revocations, and higher rates of employment and hours worked, compared with nonparticipants. However, there was no statistically significant difference between groups in hourly wage. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Ready, Willing, and Able (RWA) |
|
Jails, Correctional facilities, Corrections, Prisons, Reentry, Sentencing, Courts, Employment initiatives | This is a transitional employment program that gives those who are newly released from prison the opportunity to work and find housing. RWA seeks to provide clients with work and foundational skills so that they can find a job, secure housing, and become financially independent. The program is rated No Effects. After 3 years, RWA showed a statistically significant positive impact on jail sentences, but there was no statistically significant impact on arrests, convictions, and prison sentences. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Transitional Jobs Reentry Demonstration (TJRD) |
|
Corrections, Prisons, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Employment initiatives | This program is designed to improve behavioral and performance job skills, provide services and support, and help find job placements for participants leaving prison. The program is rated No Effects. The results showed that participation in transitional job services had no statistically significant impact on employment or recidivism over the 2-year follow-up. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Primary Care-Based Complex Care Management (San Francisco, Calif.) |
|
Corrections, Prisons, Reentry, Health and mental health, Recidivism, Crime prevention | This program is designed to provide a lower cost alternative to emergency medical treatment for chronically ill individuals who have been recently released from prison. The program is rated No Effects. Treatment group participants had statistically significantly lower rates of emergency room use, compared with the control group. However, there was no impact on recidivism and primary care utilization. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Postsecondary Correctional Education (New Mexico) |
|
Prisons, Corrections, Reentry, Inmate programs | The program provides postsecondary educational classes and programs to prisoners via one-way Internet courses or onsite vocational instruction. The goal of the program is to reduce arrests following release from prison. The program is rated Promising. This program was shown to statistically significantly reduce arrests within the 1-year follow-up period. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Lifestyle Change Program |
|
Mental health, Reentry, Corrections, Inmate programs, Crime prevention, Recidivism | This is a psychological intervention for incarcerated males, which addresses the lifestyle concepts around crime, drug use, and gambling. The main objective of the program is to reduce recidivism through introducing program participants to lifestyle changes centering on the identification of conditions, choices, and cognition of crimes. The program is rated Promising. The program participants were statistically significantly less likely to be rearrested and reincarcerated during the follow up. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: New Jersey Adult Diagnostic Treatment Center (ADTC) |
|
Sex offenders, Mental health, Sex offender management, Corrections, Prisons, Correctional facilities, Reentry, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Rape and sexual assault | The program provides cognitive–behavioral treatment and relapse prevention to people who commit repetitive, compulsive sex offenses. Cognitive–behavioral treatments focus on reconstructing person’s cognitive distortions; relapse prevention focuses on pattern recognition and breaking the cycle of recommitting sex crimes. The program is rated Promising. The intervention participants showed a statistically significant lower likelihood of recidivating, compared with the general prison-population. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: The Canton of Vaud (CV) Community Supervision Program (Switzerland) |
|
Community corrections, Corrections, Reentry, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Sentencing, Courts | This program was designed to provide a community service alternative to short custodial sentences for inmates, with the goal of improving measures of recidivism (reconviction) and social integration (marriage/employment). This program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant, long-term effects on reconviction and social integration. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Allegheny County (Pa.) Jail-Based Reentry Specialist Program |
|
Corrections, Jails, Correctional facilities, Crime prevention, Recidivism | This was a two-phase reentry program with an overall goal of reducing recidivism and improving incarcerated persons’ transition into the community. Phase 1 provided incarcerated persons with in-jail programming and services to prepare them for release. Phase 2 provided them with up to 12 months of supportive services in the community. The program was rated Effective. Program participants had a 10 percent chance of rearrest, compared with a 34 percent chance for the comparison group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Allegheny County (Pa.) Jail-Based Reentry Case Management Program |
|
Parole, Probation, Community corrections, Corrections, Crime prevention, Recidivism | This was a mandatory jail reentry program with an overall goal of reducing recidivism and improving incarcerated persons’ transition into the community. The program connected incarcerated persons to Reentry Probation Officers to help with pre-release reentry planning and continued supervision following release. The program was rated No Effects. No statistically significant differences were found between program participants and the comparison group on probation violations and probability of rear Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Minnesota Comprehensive Offender Reentry Plan (MCORP) |
|
Prisons, Inmate programs, Corrections, Correctional facilities, Crime prevention, Recidivism | This was a case management program implemented in seven different correctional institutions across Minnesota. The program connected caseworkers in prisons with supervision agents in the communities to which participants return upon release from prison. The program is rated Promising. It statistically significantly reduced recidivism as measured by rearrest, reconviction, technical violation revocation, and reincarceration for any reason, but had no impact on new offense reincarceration. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Moving On (Minnesota) |
|
Reentry, Corrections, Inmate programs | This is a curriculum-based, gender-responsive intervention created to address the different cognitive–behavioral needs of incarcerated women. The program is rated Promising. Participants in the program had a statistically significant lower likelihood to be rearrested and reconvicted, compared with the control group participants; however, the program did not have a significant impact on reincarcerations for a new offense and technical violation revocations. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Prison Industry Enhancement Certificate Program (PIECP) |
|
Prisons, Correctional facilities, Inmate programs, Corrections, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Inmate assistance programs, Employment initiatives | The program engages persons incarcerated in state prison in private sector jobs (which pay minimum wage or higher), in an effort to increase post-release employment and reduce recidivism. The program is rated Promising. Compared with those who worked in traditional prison industries and participated in other activities such as education and drug treatment, treatment group participants showed a statistically significant increase in post-release employment and a decrease in recidivism rates. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Community-based Residential Programs (Ohio) |
|
Parole, Mental health, Reentry, Corrections, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Inmate assistance programs, Employment initiatives | This program is designed to reduce recidivism by placing released those convicted of offenses in halfway houses and community-based correctional facilities in Ohio, to provide a range of programming related to chemical dependency, education, employment, and family relationships. The program is rated Promising. Participants in the treatment group had a statistically significant lower number of new arrests and reincarcerations, compared with those in the comparison group, at the 2-year follow up. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Mental Health Services Continuum Program (Calif.) |
|
Parole, Mental health, Community corrections, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Adult community-based corrections | The program targets persons on parole with mental health problems and provides services to enhance their level of individual functioning in the community. The overall goal is to reduce recidivism of mentally ill persons on parole and improve public safety. The program is rated Promising. Persons on parole who participated in the program showed a statistically significant reduction in the odds of being returned to custody. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Offender Reentry Community Safety Program |
|
Parole, Mental health, Prisons, Inmate programs, Corrections, Crime prevention, Recidivism | Formerly called the Dangerous Mentally Ill Offender Program, this is a reentry-planning and service program aimed at reducing recidivism for dangerously mentally ill people in Washington State. The program is rated Promising. Program participants had statistically significantly lower violent felony and overall felony recidivism rates compared with the matched control group 4 years following release from prison. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Washington State's Residential Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative |
|
Corrections, Reentry, Inmate programs, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Courts, Drugs, Substance abuse | This program is an alternative to incarceration for felons with substance abuse problems. In lieu of confinement, they must successfully complete a residential, chemical-dependency treatment program in the community. The program is rated Promising. Residential DOSA was shown to statistically significantly reduce overall recidivism rates compared with prison-based DOSA. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Random Drug Testing with Immediate Results and Immediate Sanctions |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Drug testing, Parole, Cocaine, Heroin, Alcohol, Reentry, Community corrections, Corrections, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Courts, Illegal substances, Opioids | This program was an experiment that was conducted to examine the efficacy of alternative methods of instant drug testing, and to determine how the different methods affected rates of relapse and recidivism of parolees with substance abuse issues. The program is rated Promising. The treatment group experienced a statistically significant decrease in rates of relapse, but no statistically significant difference in recidivism, compared with the control group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Comprehensive Anti-Gang Initiative (CAGI) |
|
Gang Crime, Gun violence, Homicide, Community policing, Reentry, Corrections, Crime prevention | A crime focused initiative, designed to address gang-related gun homicides in selected cities. The initiative involved a comprehensive model of suppression (enforcement), prevention, and reentry. The program is rated Promising. There was a significant reduction in gun homicides related to gang crime in cities that implemented the initiative. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Minnesota's Affordable Homes Program |
|
Prisons, Inmate programs, Reentry, Corrections, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Employment initiatives, Inmate assistance programs | This is a prison work crew program designed to increase the availability of affordable low-income housing while training inmates in construction-industry-specific occupational skills. The program is rated No Effects. The program had a statistically significant effect on participants’ likelihood of gaining employment in the construction field. However, there were no statistically significant effects on rearrests, reconvictions, and reincarceration. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Multimodal Community-Based Prisoner Reentry Program |
|
Drug testing, Parole, Prisons, Corrections | This is a community-based prisoner reentry program that provides substance abuse treatment to medium-to high-risk individuals placed on 24-month community correctional supervision. The program is rated No Effects. The preponderance of evidence suggests that the program had no statistically significant effect on program participants in measures of rearrest, reincarceration, and relapse. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: InnerChange Freedom Initiative (Minnesota) |
|
Prisons, Inmate programs, Corrections, Employment initiatives | This is a voluntary, faith-based prisoner reentry program that attempts to prepare inmates for reintegration into the community, employment, family, and other significant relationships through programming. The program is rated Promising. There were statistically significant reductions in rearrest, reconviction, and reincarceration rates for the treatment group, compared with the comparison group. However, there was no statistically significant impact on revocations for a technical violation. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Multisystemic Therapy–Family Integrated Transitions (MST-FIT) |
|
Mental health, Substance abuse, Reentry, Youth development, Home visiting, Treatment, Young juvenile offenders, Corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Drugs, Drug treatment | This intervention provides integrated individual and family services to juveniles who have co-occurring mental health and chemical dependency disorders during their transition from incarceration back into the community. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group youth were at statistically significantly lower risk for felony recidivism, compared with control group youth. However, there was no impact on overall recidivism, violent felony recidivism, or misdemeanor recidivism. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Operation New Hope |
|
Parole, Reentry, Violent offenders, Treatment, Community corrections, Corrections, Juvenile detention, Child health and welfare, Drugs, Drug treatment | This is a curriculum-based aftercare program designed to assist chronic, high-risk juveniles in their reintegration to the community after they are released from secure confinement. The program is rated Promising. Participants in the treatment group had a statistically significant lower number of rearrests and revocations and lower likelihood of substance use and associations with negative peers, compared with participants in the control group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Minnesota Prison-Based Sex Offender Treatment Program |
|
Sex offenders, Mental health, Prisons, Inmate programs, Reentry, Corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Rape and sexual assault, Violent crime | This is a program, provided by the Minnesota Department of Corrections, which offers treatment, therapy, and transitional services to convicted males in prison. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group inmates had a statistically significant lower likelihood of being rearrested for sex offenses, violent offenses, or any offenses, compared with comparison group inmates who did not receive any treatment. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Thinking for a Change |
|
Probation, Mental health, Reentry, Corrections, Community corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention | This is a cognitive–behavioral curriculum developed by the National Institute of Corrections, which was designed to change the criminogenic thinking of persons convicted of a crime. The program includes cognitive restructuring, social skills development, and development of problem-solving skills. The program is rated Promising. Persons in the treatment group were found to be less likely to recidivate, compared with those in the control group, at the 6-month follow-up. This difference was statist Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Transitional Case Management |
|
Parole, Corrections, Community corrections, Reentry, Alcohol, Legal substances, Drugs | This is a strengths-based, case management intervention that provided expanded case management services to incarcerated persons during their transition from incarceration to the community. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between the transitional case management treatment group and the standard referral control group in nights spent in residential substance abuse treatment or in past 30-day drug or alcohol use, at the 9-month follow up. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Project Greenlight |
|
Mental health, Prisons, Corrections, Inmate programs, Community corrections, Corrections, Reentry | This is an institution-based transitional services demonstration program, designed to be a short, intensive intervention, which could provide a greater number of individuals with reentry services at a lower cost. The program is rated No Effects. Program participants showed a statistically significant higher rate of parole revocation and rearrests for new offenses, compared with comparison group participants. However, there were no significant differences in felony rearrest rates between groups. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Modified Therapeutic Community for Individuals With Mental Illness and Chemical Abuse (MICA) Disorders Who Commit Offenses |
|
Mental health, Corrections, Reentry, Correctional facilities, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Drugs | This program is an adaptation of the therapeutic community models used with individuals who have co-occurring drug abuse problems and mental health disorders. It offers a more flexible, more personalized, and less intense approach to achieve greater reductions in substance use and recidivism. This program is rated Promising. Participants in the treatment group showed statistically significant reductions in illegal drug use, compared with the control group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Boston (Massachusetts) Reentry Initiative (BRI) |
|
Parole, Probation, Mental health, Jails, Correctional facilities, Community corrections, Crime prevention | This interagency public safety initiative aims to help incarcerated violent adults who have been convicted of a crime transition back to their neighborhoods following release from jail through various services. The program is rated Promising. The study found that after 3 years statistically significantly fewer program participants had been arrested for any crime and violent crime compared to the control group. The program was also associated with reductions in the subsequent overall time to arre Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Adolescent Community Reinforcement Approach (A-CRA) |
|
Marijuana, Alcohol, Juvenile health, Mental health, Substance abuse, Reentry, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Crime prevention, Juvenile detention, Drugs, Legal substances, Drugs | This is a behavioral intervention for youth, which is designed to reduce drug and alcohol use and promote an abstinent lifestyle. The program is rated Promising. Participants showed a statistically significant reduction in alcohol use, other drug use, and depressive symptoms, and an increase in linkage to continuing care services, adherence to the continuing care model, and social stability. However, there was no statistically significant effect on high-risk behaviors or delinquency. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Community and Law Enforcement Resources Together (ComALERT) |
|
Parole, Mental health, Reentry, Corrections, Community corrections, Corrections, Employment initiatives, Legal substances, Drugs, Policing strategies, Crime prevention | This is a reentry program in Brooklyn, N.Y., that provides substance abuse treatment, employment, and housing services for parolees. The program is rated Promising. Participants demonstrated a statistically significant lower likelihood of being rearrested or reconvicted, compared with the matched control group. However, there were no significant differences in employment and earnings, cohabitating with a partner and regular contact with their children, or drug and alcohol use. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Amity In-Prison Therapeutic Community |
|
Reentry, Corrections, Inmate programs, Drugs, Drug treatment | This program provides intensive treatment in a dedicated housing unit to male incarcerated persons with substance abuse problems during the last 9 to 12 months of their prison terms. The program is rated Promising. Participants had statistically significant lower reincarceration rates at the 24-month and 5-year follow-up periods, compared with the control group. There were no significant differences between the groups in reincarceration rates at the 36-month follow up or in drug use at the 5-year follow up. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Forever Free |
|
Parole, Corrections, Prisons, Recidivism, Reentry, Crime prevention, Employment initiatives, Inmate assistance programs, Drugs | This prison-based substance abuse treatment program for women near the end of their incarceration period is designed to reduce substance use and recidivism following release. The program is rated Promising. The intervention group reported statistically significantly fewer arrests and reconvictions and less drug use at follow up compared with the comparison group. However, there was no statistically significant effect on reincarceration and employment. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Delaware KEY/Crest Substance Abuse Programs |
|
Corrections, Correctional facilities, Prisons, Inmate programs, Reentry, Drugs, Rape and sexual assault | This program uses a drug treatment continuum of prison-based therapeutic community and residential work release for drug-involved convicted persons. The program is rated Promising. Results showed statistically significant increases in remaining drug-free after 3 years and increases in condom use after 6 months; however, there were no statistically significant effects in being injection-free (after 6 months) or arrest-free (after 3 years). Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Equipping Youth to Help One Another (EQUIP) |
|
Reentry, Youth development, Treatment, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Correctional facilities, Juvenile justice, Juvenile detention, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile detention | This is a multicomponent treatment program administered in juvenile correctional facilities for youth with conduct disorders. This program is rated Promising. Program youth showed statistically significant improvements in social skills and had statistically significant fewer instances of self-reported and staff-reported institutional misconduct, compared with control group youth. However, there were no significant differences between groups on measures of moral judgment. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Preventing Parolee Crime Program (PPCP) |
|
Parole, Reentry, Corrections, Community corrections, Prisons, Recidivism, Crime prevention | This is a multidimensional, parole-based reintegration program that aims to reduce parolees’ crime and reincarceration by providing them with services that can facilitate a successful reintegration into society following release from prison. The program is rated Promising. Parolees who participated in the program had a statistically significant lower likelihood of reincarceration, compared with parolees who did not participate. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Hawaii Opportunity Probation with Enforcement (HOPE) |
|
Drug testing, Probation, Reentry, Corrections, Community corrections | This is a community supervision strategy for substance-abusing probationers, particularly those who have long histories of drug use and involvement with the criminal justice system and are considered at high risk of failing probation or returning to prison. The program is rated Promising. Participants were less likely to miss appointments with probation officers, use drugs, and be arrested, compared with the control group. These differences were statistically significant. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Strategic Training Initiative in Community Supervision (STICS) |
|
Training, Probation, Corrections, Reentry, Recidivism, Crime prevention | This is a job-training program for probation officers (POs) to help them apply the risk–need–responsivity (RNR) model with adults who are on probation. The program is rated Promising. Treatment POs demonstrated a statistically significant higher level of quality in demonstrating RNR–based correctional and intervention skills, compared with the control group; however, there were mixed results in discussions on any and all criminogenic needs and no statistically significant difference in recidivis Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Auglaize County (Ohio) Transition (ACT) Program |
|
Parole, Probation, Mental health, Jails, Correctional facilities, Recidivism, Crime prevention | This is a jail reentry program that works to reduce inmates’ recidivism once they reenter the community, in part by linking them to various resources. The program is rated Promising. Approximately 12 percent of program participants were rearrested during the 12-month follow-up period, compared with 82 percent of control group participants, a statistically significant difference. Date Posted: |
None |
CrimeSolutions’ ratings are assigned from standardized reviews of rigorous evaluations and meta-analyses. While we encourage you to learn more about this process, you don’t need to in order to benefit from it. Our clear ratings and profiles can help you determine if a program or category of program is worth pursuing.
| Icon | Rating | Program Rating Description | Practice Rating Description |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Effective | Implementing the program is likely to result in the intended outcome(s). | On average, there is strong evidence that implementing a program encompassed by the practice will achieve the intended outcome. |
|
|
Promising | Implementing the program may result in the intended outcome(s) | On average, there is some evidence that implementing a program encompassed by the practice will achieve the intended outcome. |
|
|
No Effects | Implementing the program is unlikely to result in the intended outcome(s) and may result in a negative outcome(s). | On average, there is strong evidence that implementing a program encompassed by the practice will not achieve the intended outcome or may result in a negative outcome. |
Programs
Showing Results For:
Topic: Reentry| Title | Evidence Rating | Topics | Summary | RCT | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Profile: Prisoner Rehabilitation Authority Vocational Support and Supervision Program (Israel) |
|
Parole, Mental health, Corrections, Reentry, Community corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Employment initiatives, Inmate assistance programs, Rape and sexual assault, Effective Evidence Rating | This program provides community supervision and services to individuals released early from prison to help them find employment and reduce their recidivism. The program is rated Effective. Program participants were less likely to be reincarcerated and had higher rates of integration into the workforce, compared with individuals who did not participate in the program. These differences were statistically significant. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Denver (Colorado) Supportive Housing Social Impact Bond Initiative (Denver SIB) |
|
Corrections, Jails, Correctional facilities | This is a program for homeless individuals who are often in jail, to increase their housing stability and reduce their criminal justice involvement. The program is rated Effective. Individuals in the treatment group had statistically significant reductions in arrest, jail stays, days in jail, and shelter stays and visits, and statistically significant increases in mental health services, compared with the control group, but there was no statistically significant effect on substance use services. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Reentry Services of Clay County (Minnesota) |
|
Probation, Mental health, Substance abuse, Reentry, Case Management, Treatment, Comprehensive/wraparound services, Access to education, Corrections, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice, Juvenile (under 18), Mentoring, Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency | This is a one-to-one mentoring program aimed at improving public safety by assisting youths who commit offenses with comprehensive reentry services following their release into the community. The program is rated No Effects. There was no statistically significant difference between program and comparison group youths in prevalence of reoffense. Program youths had statistically significantly fewer official juvenile justice contacts within 1 year of release, compared with comparison group youth Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Oklahoma's Juvenile Second Chance Act Reentry Program (Tulsa, OK) |
|
Reentry, Case Management, Corrections, Juvenile recidivism prediction, Crime prevention, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile justice, Juvenile detention | This is a juvenile reentry program that offers services to youth returning to the community in Tulsa, Okla., after their out-of-home placements. The goal of the program is to reduce rates of recidivism for high-risk youth. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences in reconviction rates for treatment group youth who received the program’s services, compared with comparison group youth who did not receive services. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Daily Automated Telephony With a Brief Cognitive Intervention for Persons on Parole (Sweden) |
|
Parole, Cell Phones, Mental health, Alcohol, Community corrections, Corrections, Reentry, Legal substances, Drugs | This was an automated telephony program designed for those recently paroled in Sweden that provided immediate feedback to participants and sent daily reports to their parole officers. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group participants reported statistically significantly less alcohol use, drug use, and internalizing behaviors at the 1-month follow-up, compared with control group participants. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Creating Lasting Family Connections Fatherhood Program: Family Reintegration |
|
Reentry, Recidivism, Corrections, Crime prevention, Drugs | This is a community-based program for adult males who received substance abuse treatment while incarcerated and are reentering the community. The goals are to reduce recidivism, substance abuse, and HIV/hepatitis infection rates, and promote fatherhood and relationship skills. This program is rated Promising. Program participants had a statistically significant lower likelihood of recidivating and demonstrated an increase in relationship skills, compared with the comparison group members. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Harlem (NY) Parole Reentry Court |
|
Parole, Probation, Reentry courts, Prisons, Corrections, Specialty/problem-solving courts, Corrections, Community corrections, Inmate programs | This is a reentry program designed to assist parolees transition from life in prison to life in the community. The program is rated Promising. The treatment group had statistically significant reductions in rates of reconvictions and parole revocations, increases in numbers of months employed, and a greater likelihood of receiving a high school diploma or GED, compared with the control group. However, there were no statistically significant differences in rate of rearrests or substance use. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Veterans Moving Forward (San Diego, Calif.) |
|
Mental health, Recidivism, Crime prevention | This program is designed to assist incarcerated male veterans of the U.S. military by providing them with in-custody treatment, services, and linkage to rehabilitative programming and community resources and reduce their chances of recidivism. The program is rated Promising. Results showed a statistically significant reduction in recidivism for program participants during the 12-month follow-up period, compared with the comparison group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Delaware CREST Outreach Centers |
|
Parole, Probation, Mental health, Alcohol-Related Offenses, Corrections, Correctional facilities, Reentry, Drugs | This is a residential work-release program that uses therapy, counseling and treatment for persons convicted of a crime with a history of substance use who are reentering society. The program is rated Promising. There were statistically significant increases in participants being injection-free at 6 months and being drug-free after 3 years; however, there were no statistically significant effects in condom use (at 6 months) or being arrest-free (after 3 years). Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Second Chance Act (SCA) Adult Reentry Demonstration Programs |
|
Parole, Probation, Mental health, Reentry courts, Community corrections, Corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Employment initiatives | This is a program designed to reduce recidivism and improve employment rates through reentry services for individuals who have a moderate-to-high risk for reoffending. The program is rated No Effects. At the 30-month follow up, there were no statistically significant differences in rearrest, reconviction, reincarceration, or employment rates between program participants and control group members. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: YouthBuild Offender Program |
|
Diversion, Reentry, Youth development, Jobs and workforce development, Positive youth development, Treatment, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice, Juvenile (under 18), Young adults (18-24), Employment initiatives | The program provides education, vocational training, and other youth-development services to low-income youths, ages 16–24, who have been convicted of a crime. The program is rated Promising. The program statistically significantly reduced recidivism and increased the likelihood of receiving a high school diploma, GED, trade license, or training certificate. However, there were no effects on enrollment in postsecondary courses, employment, or certain measures of youth development. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: High-Risk Revocation Reduction (HRRR) Program in Minnesota |
|
Prisons, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Intimate partner violence, Violent crime | This is an adult reentry program designed to reduce recidivism among high-risk males who were previously released from a state prison but returned to prison for violating conditions of their supervised release. The program is rated Promising. The program was shown to have a statistically significant effect on reducing revocation and reconviction; however, it did not have a statistically significant effect on reducing rearrests and reincarceration. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Milwaukee Safe Streets Prisoner Release Initiative (PRI) |
|
Mental health, Prisons, Reentry, Employment initiatives, Inmate assistance programs | This program combines enhanced employment opportunities and wraparound services for incarcerated persons before and after release from prison. The program is rated Promising. There was a statistically significant reduction in likelihood of rearrests for program group participants, compared with the control group. There was also a lower rate of reimprisonment for program participants than nonparticipants; however, this difference was not statistically significant. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Functional Family Parole |
|
Parole, Mental health, Reentry, Treatment, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice, Child health and welfare, Employment initiatives, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a supervision program that incorporates family-focused, strengths-based principles of Functional Family Therapy. The goal of the program is to reduce re-arrests and increase employment rates. The program is rated Promising. Participants in the intervention were less likely to be re-arrested, more likely to be employed, and earned more per quarter, compared with the comparison group. These findings were statistically significant. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Gender-Responsive Intervention for Female Juvenile Offenders |
|
Girls, Mental health, Substance abuse, Reentry, Treatment, Probation, Community corrections, Corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile detention | This program provided gender-responsive services in two group homes for female youths who had been adjudicated in the delinquency (formal probation) or truancy divisions of juvenile court. The program is rated Promising. Results showed a statistically significant difference in that the girls who received gender-responsive services had lower recidivism rates after 2 years, compared with the comparison group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Intensive Outpatient Program (IOP) and Non-Hospital Residential (NHR) Program |
|
Parole, Corrections, Community corrections, Reentry, Crime prevention, Recidivism | These were community-based, substance abuse treatment programs for recently paroled, substance-dependent individuals. The primary aim of the programs was to treat participants’ substance abuse in the community while reducing their likelihood of reoffending. The program is rated Promising. Program participants were less likely to be convicted of a new crime, when compared with the community comparison group; this was a statistically significant difference. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Mentally Ill Offender Community Transition Program (Washington) |
|
Parole, Probation, Mental health, Prisons, Correctional facilities, Corrections, Reentry, Inmate programs, Recidivism, Crime prevention | The program is targeted at individuals whose mental illnesses are seen as instrumental in their offenses, and who are likely to qualify for and benefit from publicly supported treatment in the community. The overall goal is to reduce recidivism . The program is rated Effective. Participants in the program were less likely to be convicted of any new offense and convicted of felony offenses, compared with the matched comparison group. The difference was statistically significant. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Discretionary Parole in New Jersey |
|
Parole, Prisons, Reentry, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Sentencing, Courts | This allows individuals to be released early from a prison in New Jersey and complete the remainder of their sentences under supervision, with the goal of reducing recidivism. The program is rated Promising. The treatment group released early from prison had statistically significantly lower rates of reconviction, number of days until reconviction, re-arrests, and days to re-arrest, compared with those who had completed their entire sentences and were unconditionally released to the community. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Intensive Supervision for Persons on Probation at High-Risk of Committing Offenses (California) |
|
Probation, Federal parole guidelines, Community corrections, Reentry | This is an enhanced probation intervention targeted at high-risk individuals in three counties in California. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant effects of the intervention on rearrest. At one site, the treatment group had statistically significantly more technical violations, than the comparison group; however, there were no statistically significant effects on technical violation rates at the other two sites. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Returning Home - Ohio (RHO) Pilot Program |
|
Parole, Probation, Mental health, Community corrections, Prisons, Correctional facilities, Reentry, Crime prevention | This program linked incarcerated persons who had disabilities and were at risk for homelessness to supportive housing upon their release from prison. The goal was to reduce recidivism, homelessness, and multiple systems use. The program is rated Promising. The program was shown to statistically significantly reduce the probability of rearrest (but not re-incarceration) and length of time from release to rearrest; however, treatment group participants were rearrested more frequently. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Skillman Intensive Aftercare Program (Pittsburgh and Detroit) |
|
Reentry, Case Management, Comprehensive/wraparound services, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice, Juvenile (under 18) | This was an aftercare program in Pittsburgh (Penn.) and Detroit (Mich.) for juveniles transitioning out of a residential correctional program. The intent of the program was to decrease instances of reconviction and re-arrest among participating youths after their release into the community. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant effects on rates of reconviction and rearrest among program participants in either city. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Earned Early Release (Washington State) |
|
Parole, Probation, Sentencing guidelines, Courts, Prisons, Corrections, Correctional facilities, Reentry, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Intimate partner violence, Violent crime | Under a 2003 Washington State law, incarcerated individuals who had committed certain nonviolent offenses were able to acquire earlier release time of up to 50 percent of their maximum sentence. The program is rated Promising. Individuals who were released early under the law had a statistically significant lower rate of felony convictions, compared with individuals who were not released early; however, there was no statistically significant difference on violent convictions. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Florida Work Release Program |
|
Corrections, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Sentencing, Courts, Inmate assistance programs, Employment initiatives, Reentry | This reentry program allows individuals who are nearing the end of their custodial sentences to work regular jobs in the community. The program is based in work release centers in participants’ counties of residence in Florida. The program is rated as Promising. The program was found to have a statistically significant effect on reducing reconvictions of participants and increasing their employment and quarterly earnings post-release. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: North Carolina Vocational Delivery System |
|
Crime prevention, Recidivism, Employment initiatives, Inmate assistance programs | This program was designed to assist justice-involved young adults (ages 18 to 22) in obtaining postrelease employment. It involved an integrated system of vocational training and reentry services to reduce the rate of rearrest after release. This program is rated No Effects. Results suggest there were no statistically significant differences in measures of recidivism and employment between young adults who participated in the program, compared with those who did not participate. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Minnesota Prison Work Release Program |
|
Reentry, Corrections, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Employment initiatives, Inmate assistance programs | This program was designed to help individuals make a successful transition from prison to the community through provision of stable housing and support to obtain employment. The program is rated Promising. Program participants had a statistically significant decrease in rearrest, reconviction, and reincarceration rates, and an improvement in employment and number of hours worked. However, participants also had a statistically significant higher likelihood of revocations for technical violations. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Brief Motivational Interviewing for Alcohol Use (Incarcerated Women) |
|
Alcohol, Prisons, Correctional facilities, Corrections, Community corrections, Reentry, Substance abuse, Legal substances, Drugs | This program was designed to provide an alcohol intervention to incarcerated women with hazardous drinking habits who were being released from prison. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between the treatment and comparison groups on the number of days abstinent from alcohol consumption at the 6-month follow up. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Philadelphia (Penn.) Intensive Aftercare Probation Program |
|
Probation, Reentry, Violent offenders, Case Management, Corrections, Community corrections, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice, Juvenile detention | This program was an intensive alternative reintegration program for high-risk male juveniles who were being released to probation from a juvenile corrections facility. The program is rated Promising. Results showed that while there were no differences between the treatment and comparison groups on the percent who had been re-arrested during the 9-month follow up, the treatment group had a statistically significantly lower number of re-arrests than the comparison group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Indianapolis (Indiana) Reentry Project |
|
Parole, Probation, Community corrections, Corrections, Prisons | This was a reentry program in which individuals returning from prison were ordered by their parole or probation officers to participate in a 1-hour meeting within 90 days of their release. The meetings were meant to convey an intolerance for violence in the community and to allow the individuals to connect with service providers. The program is rated No Effects. The program was shown to have no statistically significant effects on the likelihood of rearrest and the time to rearrest. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: College Program at Maryland Correctional Training Center (MCTC) |
|
Corrections, Reentry, Inmate programs, Crime prevention, Recidivism | This program offered postsecondary education for incarcerated individuals to reduce or break the cycle of continued or repeated criminal behavior. The program is rated Promising. Participants in the program had a statistically significant lower rate of arrests for a new crime than comparison group members. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Social Support Treatment with Drug Testing (Maryland) |
|
Drug testing, Parole, Cocaine, Heroin, Corrections, Community corrections, Reentry, Crime prevention, Substance abuse, Cocaine, Opioids | This program involves social support integrated with regular drug testing for recently paroled individuals who have a history of heroin and cocaine abuse. The program is rated Promising. Program participants had a statistically significant lower rate of reconviction, arrest, and incarceration, compared with the comparison group; however, there were no statistically significant effects on employment. Program participants also had a statistically significant higher positive drug-testing rate. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Serious and Violent Offender Reentry Initiative (Midwestern State) |
|
Parole, Probation, Prisons, Community corrections, Corrections | This program provides enhanced reentry services to support parolees with successful transition back into the community. The program follows the principles of the risk-needs-responsivity model by targeting services to those with highest risk, addressing dynamic risk factors, and emphasizing cognitive-behavioral strategies throughout the program. The program is rated Promising. The program was found to have a statistically significant effect on reconviction, but no effect on return to prison. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Avon Park Youth Academy and STREET Smart Aftercare Program |
|
Training, Mental health, Diversion, Intake/assessment, Jobs and workforce development, Young juvenile offenders, Access to education, Reentry, Corrections, Correctional facilities, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice, Inmate assistance programs, Employment initiatives | This program was located at a secure-custody residential facility that provided educational and vocational training to moderate-risk male youth. The program is rated No Effects. Participants showed a statistically significant greater likelihood of obtaining a degree, compared with nonparticipants. However, there were no statistically significant differences in any arrest for any offense overall and felony arrest specifically, employment, time employed, or higher education enrollment. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Texas Intensive Supervision Parole (Houston and Dallas) |
|
Burglary, Larceny/theft, Assault, Homicide, Robbery, Drug testing, Parole, Drug possession, Community corrections, Prisons, Reentry | This program was designed to increase monitoring and control of persons on parole who demonstrated poor parole performance and were at high risk of returning to prison for a parole violation. This program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences in reconviction, rearrest, and employment rates between groups in both Houston and Dallas. In Houston, program participants were significantly more likely to have technical violations than those in the control group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Wayne County (Michigan) Second Chance Reentry Program |
|
Mental health, Reentry, Case Management, Comprehensive/wraparound services, Corrections, Inmate programs, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice | This is a reentry program designed to reduce recidivism and increase reentry services for males, ages 13 to 18, who have committed offenses and are placed in a locked, residential treatment facility. The program is rated Promising. The program was shown to statistically significantly decrease recidivism rates among youths who participated in the program, compared with youths who received services as usual. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Serious and Violent Offender Reentry Initiative (North Dakota) |
|
Parole, Corrections, Community corrections | This program provides enhanced reentry services to support persons on parole with successful transition back into the community. Services include chemical dependency treatment, psychiatric treatment, educational training, and assistance in finding housing. The program is rated Promising. The program was found to have a statistically significant, moderate effect on rearrest, but no statistically significant effect on revocation of parole. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Collaborative Behavioral Management in Six Sites |
|
Parole, Corrections, Community corrections, Reentry, Drugs, Substance abuse | This program involved collaborative sessions among a parole officer, treatment counselor, and the person on parole. The intervention provided parole officers with positive tools to manage the behavior of people on parole. The program aimed to reduce substance use, crime, and re-arrest among drug-involved people on parole. The program is rated No Effects. Results showed that the intervention did not significantly reduce re-arrest or overall drug use. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Regional Treatment Centre Sex Offender Treatment Program (Canada) |
|
Sex offenders, Sex offender management, Corrections, Prisons, Reentry, Inmate programs, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Rape and sexual assault, Violent crime, Crime prevention | This inpatient program provides group and individual therapy to those who have committed sexual offenses and have recently been released from prison in Ontario, Canada. The program is rated No Effects. There was no significant difference in sexual recidivism rates between the treatment group and the comparison group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Challenge Incarceration Program (CIP) |
|
Prisons, Corrections, Reentry, Inmate programs | This boot camp intervention in Minnesota combines a traditional military institutional program for 6 months with two 6-month phases of intensive, supervised release aftercare. The program is rated Promising. Program participants had statistically significant lower rates of re-arrest, felony reconviction, and return to prison for a new offense than the comparison group, but no statistically significant difference in the rate of return to prison for any offense. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: San Diego (Calif.) Prisoner Reentry Program |
|
Parole, Community corrections, Prisons, Corrections, Crime prevention, Recidivism | The program, established by Senate Bill 618, aimed to educate and rehabilitate incarcerated individuals who committed nonviolent felony offenses in an effort to reduce recidivism and revocations to prison. The program is rated No Effects. There was a statistically significant impact on program participants’ rates of rearrest. However, there were no statistically significant differences on reconviction and return to prison rates between program participants and those who were not in the program. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Opportunity to Succeed (OPTS) |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Reentry, Corrections, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Intimate partner violence, Violent crime | This program was designed to reduce relapse and criminal recidivism by providing comprehensive aftercare services to individuals convicted of felonies, with alcohol- and drug-related histories. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant program effects on rearrests, substance abuse relapse, or employment. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Back Door Electronic Monitoring (Sweden) |
|
Reentry, Community corrections, Corrections, Prisons, Sentencing, Courts | This program in Sweden involves the use of an ankle bracelet to determine the location of an individual who has been released following a short-term stay in prison. The overall goal is to reduce reoffending rates of participants. The program is rated Promising. Significantly fewer program participants were convicted of a new offense and sentenced to prison at the 3-year follow up, compared with control group participants. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: High Intensity Training (HIT) Regime at Thorn Cross Young Offenders Institution (England) |
|
Reentry, Corrections | This program is a correctional boot camp that combines elements of military training with elements of rehabilitation to prepare individuals ages 18 to 21 (considered “young offenders”) for reentry into their communities. The program is rated No Effects. At the 10-year follow up, there was no statistically significant impact on reconviction rates. Program participants had a statistically significant fewer number of reconvictions, compared with the control group; however, the difference was small. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Enhanced Thinking Skills (England) |
|
Corrections, Correctional facilities, Prisons, Reentry, Inmate programs | This is a prison-based, cognitive–behavioral skills enhancement program in England. The program is rated Effective. Program participants showed statistically significant reductions in reconviction rates and frequency of reoffending, compared with nonparticipants. However, there was no statistically significant difference between groups in severe offense reconviction rates. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Recovery Management Checkups for Women Offenders (Cook County, Ill.) |
|
Jails, Correctional facilities, Corrections, Reentry, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Legal substances, Drugs | This intervention linked women who committed nonviolent offenses to community-based, substance use treatment after release from jail. It was designed to reduce recidivism and alcohol and drug use, and to promote long-term recovery. This program is rated No Effects. The treatment group had a statistically significant greater likelihood of participating in substance use treatment; however, there were no significant effects for recidivism, alcohol and drug use, or number of days spent in jail. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Community Mediation Maryland Re-Entry Mediation |
|
Corrections, Community corrections, Inmate programs, Crime prevention | This program brings together inmates, their families, and other supporters to discuss inmates’ past experiences and future expectations in a mediated session. The session is designed to facilitate communication, understanding, and a plan for reentry to help inmates successfully transition into the community after release. The program is rated Promising. This program showed a statistically significant reduction in rearrest, reconviction, and return to prison for program participants. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Minnesota's Enhanced Supervision Release Program |
|
Parole, Probation, Community corrections, Corrections, Reentry, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Diversion, Courts | This was an intensive, supervised release program for persons at high risk for reoffense and who were mandated to residential treatment upon release from prison. The program gradually reduced restrictions as the persons on parole transitioned back into the community. The program is rated No Effects. Results showed no statistically significant effects on recidivism measures, including rearrest, revocation for technical violations, reconviction, and days in prison. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Residential Aftercare Component of Quehanna (PA) Motivational Boot Camp Program |
|
Drug testing, Mental health, Corrections, Reentry, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Drugs | This program provides residential aftercare services for those with substance abuse issues who have completed the 6-month Quehanna (PA) Motivational Boot Camp Program. The program is rated No Effects. An examination of the impact of both 30- and 90-day aftercare programs found no statistically significant effects of treatment of either dosage on recidivism. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Quehanna (PA) Motivational Boot Camp |
|
Drug testing, Mental health, Corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Rape and sexual assault | This 6-month program aims to reduce recidivism by diverting eligible candidates from prison to a boot camp that promotes discipline, structure, and characteristics of good citizenship and seeks to improve skills for reentry into the community. The program is rated Promising. Boot camp participants had statistically significantly lower rates of recidivism (measured as both rearrest and reincarceration) compared with nonparticipants at the 3-year follow-up. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Wichita (Kansas) Work Release Program |
|
Reentry, Corrections, Crime prevention, Recidivism | This is a reentry program designed to facilitate selected individuals’ transition from incarceration to community living by providing work opportunities outside of correctional facilities and less structured housing alternatives. The program is rated Promising. Program completers had statistically significantly lower recidivism rates, compared with comparison group members who did not participate in the program, at the 3-year follow-up period. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Ohio's Progressive Sanctioning Grid |
|
Corrections, Community corrections, Courts | This program uses progressive sanction guidelines from the Ohio Adult Parole Authority to determine the appropriate amount of response by authorities with regard to individuals who violate supervision. The program is rated No Effects. There was no statistically significant impact on risk of felony reoffending and major violation behavior in the first year of supervision. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Alameda County (Calif.) Integrated Dual Disorders Treatment Program |
|
Mental health, Jails, Correctional facilities, Corrections, Crime prevention | This is a post-custody, community-based intervention for individuals with co-occurring mental illness and substance use disorders. The program is rated No Effects. While the program statistically significantly reduced the number of reconvictions and incarcerations, it did not impact the number of arrests, days in jail, felony convictions, or percent of reconvictions. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Connections Program (San Diego, Calif.) |
|
Mental health, Jails, Corrections, Reentry | This program used coordinated service teams to support mentally ill individuals leaving prison in transitioning back into the community. The program is rated No Effects. Program participants showed a statistically significant lower likelihood of returning to jail during the program treatment period. However, there were no statistically significant effects on reconvictions during the program treatment period or return to jail at the 6-month follow up. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: EMPLOY (Minnesota) |
|
Prisons, Inmate programs, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Employment initiatives, Inmate assistance programs | This is a prisoner-reentry employment program designed to reduce recidivism by helping participants find and retain employment after release from prison. The program is rated Promising. Participants had statistically significant lower rates of reconviction, rearrest, reincarceration, and revocations, and higher rates of employment and hours worked, compared with nonparticipants. However, there was no statistically significant difference between groups in hourly wage. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Ready, Willing, and Able (RWA) |
|
Jails, Correctional facilities, Corrections, Prisons, Reentry, Sentencing, Courts, Employment initiatives | This is a transitional employment program that gives those who are newly released from prison the opportunity to work and find housing. RWA seeks to provide clients with work and foundational skills so that they can find a job, secure housing, and become financially independent. The program is rated No Effects. After 3 years, RWA showed a statistically significant positive impact on jail sentences, but there was no statistically significant impact on arrests, convictions, and prison sentences. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Transitional Jobs Reentry Demonstration (TJRD) |
|
Corrections, Prisons, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Employment initiatives | This program is designed to improve behavioral and performance job skills, provide services and support, and help find job placements for participants leaving prison. The program is rated No Effects. The results showed that participation in transitional job services had no statistically significant impact on employment or recidivism over the 2-year follow-up. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Primary Care-Based Complex Care Management (San Francisco, Calif.) |
|
Corrections, Prisons, Reentry, Health and mental health, Recidivism, Crime prevention | This program is designed to provide a lower cost alternative to emergency medical treatment for chronically ill individuals who have been recently released from prison. The program is rated No Effects. Treatment group participants had statistically significantly lower rates of emergency room use, compared with the control group. However, there was no impact on recidivism and primary care utilization. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Postsecondary Correctional Education (New Mexico) |
|
Prisons, Corrections, Reentry, Inmate programs | The program provides postsecondary educational classes and programs to prisoners via one-way Internet courses or onsite vocational instruction. The goal of the program is to reduce arrests following release from prison. The program is rated Promising. This program was shown to statistically significantly reduce arrests within the 1-year follow-up period. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Lifestyle Change Program |
|
Mental health, Reentry, Corrections, Inmate programs, Crime prevention, Recidivism | This is a psychological intervention for incarcerated males, which addresses the lifestyle concepts around crime, drug use, and gambling. The main objective of the program is to reduce recidivism through introducing program participants to lifestyle changes centering on the identification of conditions, choices, and cognition of crimes. The program is rated Promising. The program participants were statistically significantly less likely to be rearrested and reincarcerated during the follow up. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: New Jersey Adult Diagnostic Treatment Center (ADTC) |
|
Sex offenders, Mental health, Sex offender management, Corrections, Prisons, Correctional facilities, Reentry, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Rape and sexual assault | The program provides cognitive–behavioral treatment and relapse prevention to people who commit repetitive, compulsive sex offenses. Cognitive–behavioral treatments focus on reconstructing person’s cognitive distortions; relapse prevention focuses on pattern recognition and breaking the cycle of recommitting sex crimes. The program is rated Promising. The intervention participants showed a statistically significant lower likelihood of recidivating, compared with the general prison-population. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: The Canton of Vaud (CV) Community Supervision Program (Switzerland) |
|
Community corrections, Corrections, Reentry, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Sentencing, Courts | This program was designed to provide a community service alternative to short custodial sentences for inmates, with the goal of improving measures of recidivism (reconviction) and social integration (marriage/employment). This program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant, long-term effects on reconviction and social integration. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Allegheny County (Pa.) Jail-Based Reentry Specialist Program |
|
Corrections, Jails, Correctional facilities, Crime prevention, Recidivism | This was a two-phase reentry program with an overall goal of reducing recidivism and improving incarcerated persons’ transition into the community. Phase 1 provided incarcerated persons with in-jail programming and services to prepare them for release. Phase 2 provided them with up to 12 months of supportive services in the community. The program was rated Effective. Program participants had a 10 percent chance of rearrest, compared with a 34 percent chance for the comparison group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Allegheny County (Pa.) Jail-Based Reentry Case Management Program |
|
Parole, Probation, Community corrections, Corrections, Crime prevention, Recidivism | This was a mandatory jail reentry program with an overall goal of reducing recidivism and improving incarcerated persons’ transition into the community. The program connected incarcerated persons to Reentry Probation Officers to help with pre-release reentry planning and continued supervision following release. The program was rated No Effects. No statistically significant differences were found between program participants and the comparison group on probation violations and probability of rear Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Minnesota Comprehensive Offender Reentry Plan (MCORP) |
|
Prisons, Inmate programs, Corrections, Correctional facilities, Crime prevention, Recidivism | This was a case management program implemented in seven different correctional institutions across Minnesota. The program connected caseworkers in prisons with supervision agents in the communities to which participants return upon release from prison. The program is rated Promising. It statistically significantly reduced recidivism as measured by rearrest, reconviction, technical violation revocation, and reincarceration for any reason, but had no impact on new offense reincarceration. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Moving On (Minnesota) |
|
Reentry, Corrections, Inmate programs | This is a curriculum-based, gender-responsive intervention created to address the different cognitive–behavioral needs of incarcerated women. The program is rated Promising. Participants in the program had a statistically significant lower likelihood to be rearrested and reconvicted, compared with the control group participants; however, the program did not have a significant impact on reincarcerations for a new offense and technical violation revocations. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Prison Industry Enhancement Certificate Program (PIECP) |
|
Prisons, Correctional facilities, Inmate programs, Corrections, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Inmate assistance programs, Employment initiatives | The program engages persons incarcerated in state prison in private sector jobs (which pay minimum wage or higher), in an effort to increase post-release employment and reduce recidivism. The program is rated Promising. Compared with those who worked in traditional prison industries and participated in other activities such as education and drug treatment, treatment group participants showed a statistically significant increase in post-release employment and a decrease in recidivism rates. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Community-based Residential Programs (Ohio) |
|
Parole, Mental health, Reentry, Corrections, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Inmate assistance programs, Employment initiatives | This program is designed to reduce recidivism by placing released those convicted of offenses in halfway houses and community-based correctional facilities in Ohio, to provide a range of programming related to chemical dependency, education, employment, and family relationships. The program is rated Promising. Participants in the treatment group had a statistically significant lower number of new arrests and reincarcerations, compared with those in the comparison group, at the 2-year follow up. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Mental Health Services Continuum Program (Calif.) |
|
Parole, Mental health, Community corrections, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Adult community-based corrections | The program targets persons on parole with mental health problems and provides services to enhance their level of individual functioning in the community. The overall goal is to reduce recidivism of mentally ill persons on parole and improve public safety. The program is rated Promising. Persons on parole who participated in the program showed a statistically significant reduction in the odds of being returned to custody. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Offender Reentry Community Safety Program |
|
Parole, Mental health, Prisons, Inmate programs, Corrections, Crime prevention, Recidivism | Formerly called the Dangerous Mentally Ill Offender Program, this is a reentry-planning and service program aimed at reducing recidivism for dangerously mentally ill people in Washington State. The program is rated Promising. Program participants had statistically significantly lower violent felony and overall felony recidivism rates compared with the matched control group 4 years following release from prison. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Washington State's Residential Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative |
|
Corrections, Reentry, Inmate programs, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Courts, Drugs, Substance abuse | This program is an alternative to incarceration for felons with substance abuse problems. In lieu of confinement, they must successfully complete a residential, chemical-dependency treatment program in the community. The program is rated Promising. Residential DOSA was shown to statistically significantly reduce overall recidivism rates compared with prison-based DOSA. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Random Drug Testing with Immediate Results and Immediate Sanctions |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Drug testing, Parole, Cocaine, Heroin, Alcohol, Reentry, Community corrections, Corrections, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Courts, Illegal substances, Opioids | This program was an experiment that was conducted to examine the efficacy of alternative methods of instant drug testing, and to determine how the different methods affected rates of relapse and recidivism of parolees with substance abuse issues. The program is rated Promising. The treatment group experienced a statistically significant decrease in rates of relapse, but no statistically significant difference in recidivism, compared with the control group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Comprehensive Anti-Gang Initiative (CAGI) |
|
Gang Crime, Gun violence, Homicide, Community policing, Reentry, Corrections, Crime prevention | A crime focused initiative, designed to address gang-related gun homicides in selected cities. The initiative involved a comprehensive model of suppression (enforcement), prevention, and reentry. The program is rated Promising. There was a significant reduction in gun homicides related to gang crime in cities that implemented the initiative. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Minnesota's Affordable Homes Program |
|
Prisons, Inmate programs, Reentry, Corrections, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Employment initiatives, Inmate assistance programs | This is a prison work crew program designed to increase the availability of affordable low-income housing while training inmates in construction-industry-specific occupational skills. The program is rated No Effects. The program had a statistically significant effect on participants’ likelihood of gaining employment in the construction field. However, there were no statistically significant effects on rearrests, reconvictions, and reincarceration. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Multimodal Community-Based Prisoner Reentry Program |
|
Drug testing, Parole, Prisons, Corrections | This is a community-based prisoner reentry program that provides substance abuse treatment to medium-to high-risk individuals placed on 24-month community correctional supervision. The program is rated No Effects. The preponderance of evidence suggests that the program had no statistically significant effect on program participants in measures of rearrest, reincarceration, and relapse. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: InnerChange Freedom Initiative (Minnesota) |
|
Prisons, Inmate programs, Corrections, Employment initiatives | This is a voluntary, faith-based prisoner reentry program that attempts to prepare inmates for reintegration into the community, employment, family, and other significant relationships through programming. The program is rated Promising. There were statistically significant reductions in rearrest, reconviction, and reincarceration rates for the treatment group, compared with the comparison group. However, there was no statistically significant impact on revocations for a technical violation. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Multisystemic Therapy–Family Integrated Transitions (MST-FIT) |
|
Mental health, Substance abuse, Reentry, Youth development, Home visiting, Treatment, Young juvenile offenders, Corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Drugs, Drug treatment | This intervention provides integrated individual and family services to juveniles who have co-occurring mental health and chemical dependency disorders during their transition from incarceration back into the community. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group youth were at statistically significantly lower risk for felony recidivism, compared with control group youth. However, there was no impact on overall recidivism, violent felony recidivism, or misdemeanor recidivism. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Operation New Hope |
|
Parole, Reentry, Violent offenders, Treatment, Community corrections, Corrections, Juvenile detention, Child health and welfare, Drugs, Drug treatment | This is a curriculum-based aftercare program designed to assist chronic, high-risk juveniles in their reintegration to the community after they are released from secure confinement. The program is rated Promising. Participants in the treatment group had a statistically significant lower number of rearrests and revocations and lower likelihood of substance use and associations with negative peers, compared with participants in the control group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Minnesota Prison-Based Sex Offender Treatment Program |
|
Sex offenders, Mental health, Prisons, Inmate programs, Reentry, Corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Rape and sexual assault, Violent crime | This is a program, provided by the Minnesota Department of Corrections, which offers treatment, therapy, and transitional services to convicted males in prison. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group inmates had a statistically significant lower likelihood of being rearrested for sex offenses, violent offenses, or any offenses, compared with comparison group inmates who did not receive any treatment. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Thinking for a Change |
|
Probation, Mental health, Reentry, Corrections, Community corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention | This is a cognitive–behavioral curriculum developed by the National Institute of Corrections, which was designed to change the criminogenic thinking of persons convicted of a crime. The program includes cognitive restructuring, social skills development, and development of problem-solving skills. The program is rated Promising. Persons in the treatment group were found to be less likely to recidivate, compared with those in the control group, at the 6-month follow-up. This difference was statist Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Transitional Case Management |
|
Parole, Corrections, Community corrections, Reentry, Alcohol, Legal substances, Drugs | This is a strengths-based, case management intervention that provided expanded case management services to incarcerated persons during their transition from incarceration to the community. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between the transitional case management treatment group and the standard referral control group in nights spent in residential substance abuse treatment or in past 30-day drug or alcohol use, at the 9-month follow up. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Project Greenlight |
|
Mental health, Prisons, Corrections, Inmate programs, Community corrections, Corrections, Reentry | This is an institution-based transitional services demonstration program, designed to be a short, intensive intervention, which could provide a greater number of individuals with reentry services at a lower cost. The program is rated No Effects. Program participants showed a statistically significant higher rate of parole revocation and rearrests for new offenses, compared with comparison group participants. However, there were no significant differences in felony rearrest rates between groups. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Modified Therapeutic Community for Individuals With Mental Illness and Chemical Abuse (MICA) Disorders Who Commit Offenses |
|
Mental health, Corrections, Reentry, Correctional facilities, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Drugs | This program is an adaptation of the therapeutic community models used with individuals who have co-occurring drug abuse problems and mental health disorders. It offers a more flexible, more personalized, and less intense approach to achieve greater reductions in substance use and recidivism. This program is rated Promising. Participants in the treatment group showed statistically significant reductions in illegal drug use, compared with the control group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Boston (Massachusetts) Reentry Initiative (BRI) |
|
Parole, Probation, Mental health, Jails, Correctional facilities, Community corrections, Crime prevention | This interagency public safety initiative aims to help incarcerated violent adults who have been convicted of a crime transition back to their neighborhoods following release from jail through various services. The program is rated Promising. The study found that after 3 years statistically significantly fewer program participants had been arrested for any crime and violent crime compared to the control group. The program was also associated with reductions in the subsequent overall time to arre Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Adolescent Community Reinforcement Approach (A-CRA) |
|
Marijuana, Alcohol, Juvenile health, Mental health, Substance abuse, Reentry, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Crime prevention, Juvenile detention, Drugs, Legal substances, Drugs | This is a behavioral intervention for youth, which is designed to reduce drug and alcohol use and promote an abstinent lifestyle. The program is rated Promising. Participants showed a statistically significant reduction in alcohol use, other drug use, and depressive symptoms, and an increase in linkage to continuing care services, adherence to the continuing care model, and social stability. However, there was no statistically significant effect on high-risk behaviors or delinquency. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Community and Law Enforcement Resources Together (ComALERT) |
|
Parole, Mental health, Reentry, Corrections, Community corrections, Corrections, Employment initiatives, Legal substances, Drugs, Policing strategies, Crime prevention | This is a reentry program in Brooklyn, N.Y., that provides substance abuse treatment, employment, and housing services for parolees. The program is rated Promising. Participants demonstrated a statistically significant lower likelihood of being rearrested or reconvicted, compared with the matched control group. However, there were no significant differences in employment and earnings, cohabitating with a partner and regular contact with their children, or drug and alcohol use. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Amity In-Prison Therapeutic Community |
|
Reentry, Corrections, Inmate programs, Drugs, Drug treatment | This program provides intensive treatment in a dedicated housing unit to male incarcerated persons with substance abuse problems during the last 9 to 12 months of their prison terms. The program is rated Promising. Participants had statistically significant lower reincarceration rates at the 24-month and 5-year follow-up periods, compared with the control group. There were no significant differences between the groups in reincarceration rates at the 36-month follow up or in drug use at the 5-year follow up. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Forever Free |
|
Parole, Corrections, Prisons, Recidivism, Reentry, Crime prevention, Employment initiatives, Inmate assistance programs, Drugs | This prison-based substance abuse treatment program for women near the end of their incarceration period is designed to reduce substance use and recidivism following release. The program is rated Promising. The intervention group reported statistically significantly fewer arrests and reconvictions and less drug use at follow up compared with the comparison group. However, there was no statistically significant effect on reincarceration and employment. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Delaware KEY/Crest Substance Abuse Programs |
|
Corrections, Correctional facilities, Prisons, Inmate programs, Reentry, Drugs, Rape and sexual assault | This program uses a drug treatment continuum of prison-based therapeutic community and residential work release for drug-involved convicted persons. The program is rated Promising. Results showed statistically significant increases in remaining drug-free after 3 years and increases in condom use after 6 months; however, there were no statistically significant effects in being injection-free (after 6 months) or arrest-free (after 3 years). Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Equipping Youth to Help One Another (EQUIP) |
|
Reentry, Youth development, Treatment, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Correctional facilities, Juvenile justice, Juvenile detention, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile detention | This is a multicomponent treatment program administered in juvenile correctional facilities for youth with conduct disorders. This program is rated Promising. Program youth showed statistically significant improvements in social skills and had statistically significant fewer instances of self-reported and staff-reported institutional misconduct, compared with control group youth. However, there were no significant differences between groups on measures of moral judgment. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Preventing Parolee Crime Program (PPCP) |
|
Parole, Reentry, Corrections, Community corrections, Prisons, Recidivism, Crime prevention | This is a multidimensional, parole-based reintegration program that aims to reduce parolees’ crime and reincarceration by providing them with services that can facilitate a successful reintegration into society following release from prison. The program is rated Promising. Parolees who participated in the program had a statistically significant lower likelihood of reincarceration, compared with parolees who did not participate. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Hawaii Opportunity Probation with Enforcement (HOPE) |
|
Drug testing, Probation, Reentry, Corrections, Community corrections | This is a community supervision strategy for substance-abusing probationers, particularly those who have long histories of drug use and involvement with the criminal justice system and are considered at high risk of failing probation or returning to prison. The program is rated Promising. Participants were less likely to miss appointments with probation officers, use drugs, and be arrested, compared with the control group. These differences were statistically significant. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Strategic Training Initiative in Community Supervision (STICS) |
|
Training, Probation, Corrections, Reentry, Recidivism, Crime prevention | This is a job-training program for probation officers (POs) to help them apply the risk–need–responsivity (RNR) model with adults who are on probation. The program is rated Promising. Treatment POs demonstrated a statistically significant higher level of quality in demonstrating RNR–based correctional and intervention skills, compared with the control group; however, there were mixed results in discussions on any and all criminogenic needs and no statistically significant difference in recidivis Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Auglaize County (Ohio) Transition (ACT) Program |
|
Parole, Probation, Mental health, Jails, Correctional facilities, Recidivism, Crime prevention | This is a jail reentry program that works to reduce inmates’ recidivism once they reenter the community, in part by linking them to various resources. The program is rated Promising. Approximately 12 percent of program participants were rearrested during the 12-month follow-up period, compared with 82 percent of control group participants, a statistically significant difference. Date Posted: |
None |