Bullying
Knowing what to do starts with knowing what works, and what hasn't. CrimeSolutions helps practitioners and policymakers understand what programs & practices work, are promising, or haven't worked yet.
On this page you can find programs and practices related to Bullying. Select "Search Filters" to narrow down the list by rating, extent of evidence, and many other aspects of the programs or practices. Skip to Practices
CrimeSolutions’ ratings are assigned from standardized reviews of rigorous evaluations and meta-analyses. While we encourage you to learn more about this process, you don’t need to in order to benefit from it. Our clear ratings and profiles can help you determine if a program or category of program is worth pursuing.
Icon | Rating | Program Rating Description | Practice Rating Description |
---|---|---|---|
Effective | Implementing the program is likely to result in the intended outcome(s). | On average, there is strong evidence that implementing a program encompassed by the practice will achieve the intended outcome. | |
Promising | Implementing the program may result in the intended outcome(s) | On average, there is some evidence that implementing a program encompassed by the practice will achieve the intended outcome. | |
No Effects | Implementing the program is unlikely to result in the intended outcome(s) and may result in a negative outcome(s). | On average, there is strong evidence that implementing a program encompassed by the practice will not achieve the intended outcome or may result in a negative outcome. |
Programs
Showing Results For:
Topic: BullyingTitle | Evidence Rating | Topics | Summary | RCT | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Profile: One Love Escalation Workshop for Dating Abuse Prevention in the Military |
|
Dating violence, Military personnel, Bullying, Crime prevention | This program involves film and guided discussion to promote bystander behavior related to dating abuse. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between the intervention and control groups on intervening when a peer was being harmed or physically hurt by an intimate partner, or when a peer was intoxicated or being bullied. The intervention group was statistically significantly more likely to intervene in peer self-harm, compared with the control group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Prev@cib Program (Spain) |
|
Bullying, School safety, Computers, Campus Crime, Children exposed to violence, School climate, Schools, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Victimization, Victims of crime | This is an anti-bullying program for adolescents in Spain, which is designed to decrease bullying and cyberbullying perpetration and victimization both in the classroom and virtual environments. The program is rated Promising. There was a statistically significant decrease in bullying and victimization and cyberbullying and cybervictimization for the treatment group, compared with the control group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Olweus Bullying Prevention Program |
|
Bullying, School safety, School climate, School violence, Juvenile (under 18), Schools, Child health and welfare, Victimization, Victims of crime | This is a schoolwide, multicomponent intervention to reduce and prevent aggression and bullying among students. The program is rated Promising. There was a statistically significant intervention effect on teachers’ ratings of students’ physical, verbal, and relational aggression and victimization. However, there was no statistically significant intervention effect on students’ self-reports of physical and relational aggression and victimization. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Emotional and Behavioral Health Crisis Response and Prevention (EBH-CRP) |
|
Bullying, Mental health, School safety, School climate, Juvenile (under 18), Crisis response, Victims of crime | The program aims to increase school/community competence in responding to and preventing student emotional and behavioral health crises. This program is rated Promising. Compared with control schools, intervention schools had statistically significantly lower rates of suspensions and office referrals and had conducted more threat assessments and crisis interventions. However, there were no significant effects on bullying, juvenile justice referrals, and emotional or behavioral health incidents. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Second Step for Elementary School (2011 Edition) |
|
Bullying, School safety, Youth development, Positive youth development, School climate, Schools, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is a school-based, social–emotional learning program for elementary school students. Teachers incorporate 25-40-minute lessons within the usual classroom curriculum. The program is rated No Effects. The treatment group displayed a statistically significant reduction in hyperactivity; however, there were no statistically significant differences between the treatment and control groups on measures of conduct problems, peer problems, social–emotional competence, or disruptive behaviors. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Second Step: Student Success Through Prevention Middle School Program (2008 Edition) |
|
Bullying, School safety, Youth development, Positive youth development, School climate, Schools, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Victimization, Victims of crime | This is a universal, school-based social-emotional learning program aimed at reducing violence and encouraging academic success among middle school students. The program is rated No Effects. While the program had a statistically significant impact on reducing physical aggression, there was no statistically significant impact on sexual-violence victimization and perpetration, peer victimization, bullying victimization and perpetration, cyberbullying, or homophobic name calling. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Social Aggression Prevention Program (SAPP) |
|
Juvenile health, Mental health, School safety, Youth development, Positive youth development, School climate, Bullying, Schools, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a school-based, small-group program designed to prevent social aggression and increase empathy, prosocial behavior, and social problem–solving skills among fifth-grade females. The program is rated No Effects. Through treatment group, students demonstrated some statistically significantly improved social problem–solving skills, compared with control group students. There was no effect on prosocial behavior or social aggression. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Pre-K RECAP |
|
Juvenile health, Mental health, School safety, Youth development, Positive youth development, School climate, Bullying, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a semi-structured, school-based intervention program developed for pre-kindergarten students seeking to improve emotional and behavioral problems and promote social skills development. The program is rated Promising. Evaluation results showed no differences regarding parent-rated behavioral problems or social skill, but teacher ratings of child behavioral problems and social skills statistically significantly improved in the intervention group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Stop School Bullying (Greece) |
|
Bullying, Juvenile health, Mental health, School safety, Youth development, Positive youth development, Schools, Victimization, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Victims of crime | This is a preventative, school-based program for students in 4th, 5th, and 6th grades (ages 9–12) that sought to reduce rates of bullying and victimization within elementary schools. The program is rated Effective. Evaluation results suggest that the program statistically significantly reduced bullying and victimization rates at schools that implemented the program compared with a control group of schools that did not. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: WITS Primary Program |
|
Bullying, School safety, Positive youth development, School climate, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Victimization, Victims of crime | This is a community-based, schoolwide intervention aimed at children in grades 1 through 3 that targets socially competent behaviors and risks for peer victimization. The program was rated Promising. The program was shown to have statistically significant, positive effects on physical and relational victimization and social competence, but not on social responsibility or physical aggression. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Bully-Proofing Your School |
|
Bullying, School safety, Positive youth development, Schools, Victimization, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Victims of crime | This is a school-based intervention program focused on reducing instances of bullying and victimization, while increasing the safety of students in grades 3–5. The program is rated Promising. In all outcomes, the treatment schools showed statistically significant reductions in bullying, victimization, and witnessed aggression, as well as statistically significant increases in perceptions of safety at school. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Success in Stages® Program |
|
Bullying, School safety, Computers, Youth development, School climate, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Victims of crime | This was an antibullying program for all students involved: victims, passive bystanders, and bullies. The program is rated Promising. Elementary, middle, and high school treatment groups experienced statistically significant greater proportions of students reporting no participation in bullying-related roles at the posttests. The elementary student treatment group saw statistically significant reductions in bullying and victimization but no statistically significant change in bystander behavior. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Adults and Children Together (ACT) Raising Safe Kids Program |
|
Children exposed to violence, Trauma, Bullying, Schools, School safety, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | This is an antiviolence program designed to prevent child maltreatment by providing education, resources, and support to parents to improve their parenting skills. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group parents reported a statistically significant reduction in using harsh discipline strategies and increase in appropriate developmental expectations, compared with control group parents at the 3-month follow up. However, there was no statistically significant difference in nurturing. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Steps to Respect® |
|
Bullying, School safety, Youth development, School climate, Child health and welfare, Victimization, Juvenile (under 18), Victims of crime | This is a schoolwide bullying prevention program that seeks to reduce bullying perpetration and victimization by increasing staff awareness and students’ social–emotional skills. The program is rated No Effects. Despite some statistically significant findings, there were no statistically significant differences between students in intervention and control schools in self-reported bullying victimization, observed nonphysical bullying, self-reported bullying perpetration, and gossip victimization. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Second Step®: A Violence Prevention Curriculum for Elementary School (2002 Edition) |
|
Bullying, School safety, Youth development, School climate, Schools, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | This was a universal prevention program designed to reduce impulsive and aggressive behavior in children. The program is rated No Effects. Intervention students had a statistically significant lower likelihood of using aggression while negotiating, needing adult intervention in conflict resolution, and showing more socially competent behavior and prosocial goals. However, the differences between the groups were small and there were no statistically significant differences in antisocial behavior. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Positive Action |
|
Schools, Bullying, Substance abuse, School safety, Youth development, Positive youth development, Afterschool, School climate, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This program uses a curriculum-based approach to improve youth academics, behavior, and character. The program is rated Effective. Treatment group students reported statistically significantly less substance use, sexual activity, violent behavior, serious violence-related behavior, and bullying behavior, compared with control group students. There were no statistically significant differences in measures of disruptive behaviors. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: KiVa Antibullying Program |
|
Bullying, School safety, Children exposed to violence, School climate, Victimization, Juvenile (under 18), Victims of crime, Cyberbullying, Child health and welfare | This school-based program delivered to elementary school students to reduce bullying and victimization was designed for national use in the Finnish comprehensive schools. This program is rated Promising. There were statistically significant reductions for self-reported bullying and victimization and peer-reported victimization for KiVa schools compared with control schools; however, there were no significant differences between treatment and comparison schools on peer-reported bullying. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: The Leadership Program's Violence Prevention Project |
|
School safety, Treatment, School climate, Bullying, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a school-based prevention program for students between the ages of 12 and 16, which is designed to increase peer support, improve conflict-resolution skills, and decrease acceptance attitudes toward aggression and violence. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group students reported a statistically significant lower likelihood of using negative conflict-resolution skills (e.g., verbal or physical aggression), compared with comparison group students, at the posttest. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Fourth R Curriculum |
|
Dating violence, School safety, Rape and sexual assault, Crime prevention, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile (under 18), Crime prevention, Victimization, Intimate partner violence, Violent crime, Victims of crime, Drugs | This interactive classroom curriculum is designed to reduce youth dating violence by addressing bullying, unsafe sexual behavior, and substance use. The program is rated No Effects. The program had small, statistically significant effects on decreasing dating violence and sexual harassment/assault victimization. However, there were no significant effects on sexual harassment/assault perpetration, peer violence perpetration or victimization, sexual activity, substance use, or prosocial attitudes. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial |
Title | Evidence Rating | Topics | Summary | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Practice Profile: School-Based Cyberbullying Prevention Programs |
|
Bullying, School safety, Computers, School climate, Victimization, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Victims of crime | This practice aims to decrease cyberbullying perpetration and victimization and promote cyber-bystander behaviors among students in kindergarten through grade 12. This practice is rated Promising for reducing cyberbullying perpetration and victimization and is rated Promising for reducing bullying perpetration and victimization. This practice is rated No Effects for promoting cyber-bystander behaviors. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: School-Based Interventions to Reduce Suspension and Arrest |
|
Truancy, Youth development, Afterschool, School climate, Juvenile delinquency | This practice includes universal and targeted school-based interventions that aim to reduce student arrests and suspensions by helping students develop prosocial behavioral skills or improving school environment by revising school discipline practices. This practice is rated No Effects for reducing student suspensions and rated No Effects for reducing arrest rates of students. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Parent-Involved Antibullying Programs for Youth |
|
Bullying, Children exposed to violence, Trauma, Schools, School safety, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Victimization, Mental health | This practice includes programs that offer a parent-involved component to reduce bullying perpetration and victimization. This practice is rated Promising for reducing bullying victimization and perpetration, reducing negative parenting, and improving positive parenting skills but is rated No Effects for reducing youth depression. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Selective School-Based Violence Prevention Programs |
|
Bullying, School safety, School climate, Schools, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This practice consists of programs designed to prevent or reduce aggressive or violent behavior in K–12 students who are considered at risk of or who have demonstrated such antisocial behaviors. The practice is rated Effective for reducing aggression in students who participated in school-based violence prevention programs, compared with students who did not participate. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Cyberbullying Prevention and Intervention Programs |
|
Bullying, School safety, School climate, Schools, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Victimization | This practice comprises intervention and prevention programs that are designed to reduce or prevent negative online behaviors among school-aged children ages 9 to 19. Programs include individual-level, multi-level systemic, and universal or whole-school approaches. This practice is rated Effective for reducing cyberbullying perpetration and victimization. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: School-Based Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) Programs |
|
Mental health, School safety, Youth development, School climate, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | Designed to foster the development of five interrelated sets of cognitive, affective, and behavioral competencies, in order to provide a foundation for better adjustment and academic performance in students, which can result in more positive social behaviors, fewer conduct problems, and less emotional distress. The practice was rated Effective in reducing students’ conduct problems and emotional stress. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Bullying Prevention Programs |
|
Bullying, School safety, School climate, Schools, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Victimization, Mental health, Victims of crime | The practice includes programs designed to reduce bullying perpetration and victimization and to increase positive bystander behavior in bullying situations. The practice is rated Effective for reducing bullying perpetration (e.g., overall and physical), reducing bullying victimization (e.g., overall and relational), and increasing positive bystander behavior. The practice is rated No Effects for increasing bystander empathy for bullying victims and reducing verbal bullying victimization. Date Posted: |