Public Order Offenses
Knowing what to do starts with knowing what works, and what hasn't. CrimeSolutions helps practitioners and policymakers understand what programs & practices work, are promising, or haven't worked yet.
On this page you can find programs and practices related to Public Order Offenses. Select "Search Filters" to narrow down the list by rating, extent of evidence, and many other aspects of the programs or practices. Skip to Practices
CrimeSolutions’ ratings are assigned from standardized reviews of rigorous evaluations and meta-analyses. While we encourage you to learn more about this process, you don’t need to in order to benefit from it. Our clear ratings and profiles can help you determine if a program or category of program is worth pursuing.
| Icon | Rating | Description |
|---|---|---|
|
Effective | Implementing the program, or a program encompassed by the practice, will achieve the intended outcome. |
|
Promising | Implementing the program, or a program encompassed by the practice, will achieve the intended outcome. |
|
Ineffective | Implementing the program, or a program encompassed by the practice, will not achieve the intended outcome. |
|
Negative Effects | Implementing the program, or program encompassed by the practice, will not result in intended outcome(s) and may result in harmful effects. |
Programs
Showing Results For:
Topic: public order offenses| Title | Evidence Rating | Topics | Summary | RCT | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Profile: Pennsylvania Horticultural Society’s Vacant Lot Greening Program |
|
Burglary, Larceny/theft, Gun violence, Robbery, Environmental design, Crime prevention, Property crime, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile (under 18), Assault, Gun violence, Violent crime, Public order offenses, Crime prevention | This was an intervention to reduce crime and delinquency in urban areas by remediating vacant land. The program is rated Promising. Compared with the control area, treatment areas experienced statistically significant reductions in gun assaults, burglary, nuisances, shootings (overall and per kilometer), and all crimes overall. However, the intervention showed mixed results with regard to drug offense rates and no statistically significant effect on robbery/theft rates. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Broken Windows/Public Order Policing in High Crime Areas (CA) |
|
Patrol, Problem-oriented policing, Public order offenses, Crime prevention | This program was implemented in three midsized cities near the Los Angeles, California area, with the goal of examining effects on residents’ fear of crime, perceptions of collective efficacy and police legitimacy, and actual and perceived levels of crime and disorder. The program is rated Ineffective. Findings revealed no statistically significant impacts on any of the dependent variables, suggesting no indication of either beneficial effects or “backfire” effects in targeted areas. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Safer Cities Initiative |
|
Assault, Robbery, Patrol, Problem-oriented policing, Situational crime prevention, Property crime, Violent crime, Policing strategies | This is a place-based policing intervention that was designed to reduce crime and disorder associated with homeless encampments in the “Skid Row” section of Los Angeles, Calif. The program is rated Promising. The treatment group areas had statistically significant reductions in nuisance crime, violent crime, and property crime, compared with comparison group areas. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Kansas City (MO) Police Department Street Narcotics Unit |
|
Weapons violations, Drug possession, Drug trafficking, Cocaine, Evidence, Surveillance, Warrants, Problem-oriented policing, Law enforcement, Law enforcement operations, Arrests, Policing strategies, Crime prevention, Public order offenses | This was a special police unit that conducted raids of crack houses to reduce crack-related crime and improve public order in Kansas City, Mo. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between the experimental and control groups in calls for service (including calls for violent, property, and disorder offenses) and reported offenses (including violent and property offenses). Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial |
CrimeSolutions’ ratings are assigned from standardized reviews of rigorous evaluations and meta-analyses. While we encourage you to learn more about this process, you don’t need to in order to benefit from it. Our clear ratings and profiles can help you determine if a program or category of program is worth pursuing.
| Icon | Rating | Description |
|---|---|---|
|
|
Effective | Implementing the program, or a program encompassed by the practice, will achieve the intended outcome. |
|
|
Promising | Implementing the program, or a program encompassed by the practice, will achieve the intended outcome. |
|
|
Ineffective | Implementing the program, or a program encompassed by the practice, will not achieve the intended outcome. |
|
|
Negative Effects | Implementing the program, or program encompassed by the practice, will not result in intended outcome(s) and may result in harmful effects. |
Programs
Showing Results For:
Topic: public order offenses| Title | Evidence Rating | Topics | Summary | RCT | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Profile: Pennsylvania Horticultural Society’s Vacant Lot Greening Program |
|
Burglary, Larceny/theft, Gun violence, Robbery, Environmental design, Crime prevention, Property crime, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile (under 18), Assault, Gun violence, Violent crime, Public order offenses, Crime prevention | This was an intervention to reduce crime and delinquency in urban areas by remediating vacant land. The program is rated Promising. Compared with the control area, treatment areas experienced statistically significant reductions in gun assaults, burglary, nuisances, shootings (overall and per kilometer), and all crimes overall. However, the intervention showed mixed results with regard to drug offense rates and no statistically significant effect on robbery/theft rates. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Broken Windows/Public Order Policing in High Crime Areas (CA) |
|
Patrol, Problem-oriented policing, Public order offenses, Crime prevention | This program was implemented in three midsized cities near the Los Angeles, California area, with the goal of examining effects on residents’ fear of crime, perceptions of collective efficacy and police legitimacy, and actual and perceived levels of crime and disorder. The program is rated Ineffective. Findings revealed no statistically significant impacts on any of the dependent variables, suggesting no indication of either beneficial effects or “backfire” effects in targeted areas. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
| Program Profile: Safer Cities Initiative |
|
Assault, Robbery, Patrol, Problem-oriented policing, Situational crime prevention, Property crime, Violent crime, Policing strategies | This is a place-based policing intervention that was designed to reduce crime and disorder associated with homeless encampments in the “Skid Row” section of Los Angeles, Calif. The program is rated Promising. The treatment group areas had statistically significant reductions in nuisance crime, violent crime, and property crime, compared with comparison group areas. Date Posted: |
None | ||
| Program Profile: Kansas City (MO) Police Department Street Narcotics Unit |
|
Weapons violations, Drug possession, Drug trafficking, Cocaine, Evidence, Surveillance, Warrants, Problem-oriented policing, Law enforcement, Law enforcement operations, Arrests, Policing strategies, Crime prevention, Public order offenses | This was a special police unit that conducted raids of crack houses to reduce crack-related crime and improve public order in Kansas City, Mo. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between the experimental and control groups in calls for service (including calls for violent, property, and disorder offenses) and reported offenses (including violent and property offenses). Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial |