Program Goals
Prisoner reentry is one of the foremost social problems of the 21st century. As a result, extensive research has been conducted to understand why some individuals continue a life of crime and others are able to desist from crime. Visitation, which has been a longstanding feature of the U.S. prison system, has been considered a way to reduce the recidivism rate. It is believed that through visitation, incarcerated persons can create ties to the community, which can reduce recidivism, and improve in-prison behavior and adjustment. Families, friends, and the community are assumed to provide support for incarcerated persons and reduce the likelihood that they will recidivate once they return to the community.
Program Components
In-prison visitation is available to all general incarcerated persons of the Florida Department of Corrections (DOC). During in-prison visitation, incarcerated persons receive visits from family members, spouses/significant others, children, other relatives, and friends. In the Florida DOC, incarcerated persons are given copies of the visitor applications once they reach their permanent location. Incarcerated persons are responsible for sending the applications to those they wish to be considered for placement on the visitor list. An application must be completed by all visitors aged 12 or older, and takes approximately 30 days to process. A visitor can only be on the visiting list for one incarcerated person at a time. Visitation is held on the weekends for all incarcerated persons.
Visitation is approved by the warden of the corrections facility. Approval will be given to the incarcerated person, who is responsible for notifying the desired party. A visitor can be disqualified from visiting if they provide false or inaccurate information, or, in some cases, if they have a criminal history. The warden will look into the nature, extent, and recency of the criminal offense when determining whether or not to approve the visitation. Visitors are not permitted to exchange or give anything to the incarcerated persons. The Florida DOC holds that in-prison visitation is not a right but a privilege for incarcerated persons, and can be revoked for a period of time based on their behavior.
Program Theory
The basis of in-prison visitation is to reduce recidivism. There are many theories that hold that prison visits play important roles during incarceration, through providing a buffer against prison life, and after prison, through increasing the chances that incarcerated persons will be supported following release. Some of these theories include the social bond theory, the strain theory, and the labeling theory. Visitation may strengthen their social bonds, and constrain him from engaging in further criminal behavior. Visitation creates and sustains bonds through face-to-face interaction. Further, visitation can offer incarcerated persons the opportunity to preserve or restore relationships that were severed as a result of their imprisonment. This interaction fosters ties between the incarcerated person and the outside community, and can have an overwhelming effect on the incarcerated person’s behavior. Such interaction can also provide incarcerated persons with access to resources (i.e., housing, jobs) following their release, which can reduce the likelihood of reoffending (Mears et al. 2011).
In-prison visitation may also decrease the strain felt by the incarcerated person during and after the incarceration period. According to the strain theory, visitations can reduce the feelings of loss and hopelessness associated with the ties they have with their families or friends (Mears et al. 2011).
Lastly, in-prison visitation can decrease the labeling effects that are associated with incarceration. According to the labeling theory, imprisonment may cause an incarcerated persons to identify him or herself as an “offender” (Mears et al. 2011).As a result, visits, and thus social support, during their period of incarceration can help incarcerated persons view themselves as prosocial individuals who are more than the crime they committed (Mears et al. 2011).