Study
Etherington and colleagues (2017) used a quasi-experimental (pre–posttest with comparison group) design to examine the impact of the Foundations of Violence Against Women (VAW) Online Training Course. The training course was promoted via email to all shelters and partner organizations in Ontario, Canada; at provincial events in the fall of 2015; and through social media and the Ontario Association of Interval and Transition Houses (OAITH) website. To participate, individuals had to create an account with OAITH’s online learning portal and self-enroll in the course. There were two training sessions provided in 2016, one in January (Course 1) and one in February (Course 2). Enrollment for both sessions opened at the same time, giving individuals the option as to which session they would enroll in. In the study, participants in Course 2 served as the comparison group, and participants in Course 1 served as the intervention group.
A total of 187 individuals registered for the online training course in January and February. However, 79 individuals did not complete the course and were excluded from the analyses. This resulted in a final sample of 108 participants (50 in Course 1 and 58 in Course 2). There was no statistically significant difference between individuals who dropped out and those who remained in the course on demographic characteristics assessed, including age and education level. In addition, there was no statistically significant difference between participants in Course 1 and participants in Course 2. Ages ranged from 17 to 64, with most participants (52 percent) between 25 to 34 years of age. Most participants (60 percent) had 3 years or less of experience in the VAW sector, and almost the same amount (66 percent) had a postsecondary degree. Almost all participants (90 percent) had participated in prior VAW training or learning experiences. There was no information provided about race/ethnicity or gender of the participants.
Pre- and posttest survey questions were developed based on a series of core competencies for domestic violence training programs. Survey measures looked at knowledge and attitudes of participants. Knowledge measures included 15 multiple-choice and true–false questions, where participants had to correctly identify the answer on topics such as oppression, intersectional analysis, self-reflective practice, documentation, survivors with mental health conditions, risk, and harm reduction. Each correct response was assigned a value of 1 and summed (the maximum score was 15). Attitudinal measures involved participants indicating their level of agreement with 15 statements such as “women who stay in abusive relationships do not consider the safety of their children.” Level of agreement was rated on a scale from 0 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree); the maximum score was 60.
ANCOVA and ordinary least squares (OLS) regression models were also used to account for participant demographic characteristics (such as age, education, and previous training). The posttest scores of the intervention group (in Course 1) were compared with the pretest scores of the wait-list comparison group (in Course 2), to determine whether increases in scores could be attributed to the online training course, using two-sample t tests. There was no subgroup analysis conducted.